• English 
    • español
    • English
    • français
  • FacebookPinterestTwitter
  • español
  • English
  • français
View Item 
  •   DIGIBUG Home
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Traducción e Interpretación
  • DTI - Artículos
  • View Item
  •   DIGIBUG Home
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Traducción e Interpretación
  • DTI - Artículos
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Deep Learning Methods for Extracting Metaphorical Names of Flowers and Plants

[PDF] 6558-6053-1-PB.pdf (1.120Mb)
Identificadores
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10481/87044
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26342/2023-71-20
Exportar
RISRefworksMendeleyBibtex
Estadísticas
View Usage Statistics
Metadata
Show full item record
Author
Haddad Haddad, Amal; Premasiri, Damith; Ranasinghe, Tharindu; Mitkov, Ruslan
Editorial
Sociedad Española para el Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural
Date
2023-09-01
Referencia bibliográfica
Haddad Haddad, A., Premasiri, D., Ranasinghe, T. & Mitkov, R. (2023) Deep Learning Methods for Extracting Metaphorical Names of Flowers and Plants. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural(71)pages 261-271. doi:10.26342/2023-71-20.
Abstract
The domain of Botany is rich with metaphorical terms. Those terms play an important role in the description and identification of flowers and plants. However, the identification of such terms in discourse is an arduous task. This leads in some cases to committing errors during translation processes and lexicographic tasks. The process is even more challenging when it comes to machine translation, both in the cases of single-word terms and multi-word terms. One of the recent concerns of Natural Language Processing (NLP) applications and Machine Translation (MT) technologies is the automatic identification of metaphor-based words in discourse through Deep Learning (DL). In this study, we seek to fill this gap through the use of thirteen popular transformer based models, as well as ChatGPT, and we show that discriminative models perform better than GPT-3.5 model with our best performer report
Collections
  • DTI - Artículos

My Account

LoginRegister

Browse

All of DIGIBUGCommunities and CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectFinanciaciónAuthor profilesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectFinanciación

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Servicios

Pasos para autoarchivoAyudaLicencias Creative CommonsSHERPA/RoMEODulcinea Biblioteca UniversitariaNos puedes encontrar a través deCondiciones legales

Contact Us | Send Feedback