A Review of Fingerprint Feature Representations and Their Applications for Latent Fingerprint Identification: Trends and Evaluation
MetadataShow full item record
AuthorValdés Ramírez, Danilo; Medina Pérez, Miguel Ángel; Monroy, Raúl; Loyola González, Octavio; Rodríguez, Jorge; Morales, Aythami; Herrera Triguero, Francisco
Latent fingerprint identificationMinutia descriptorFingerprint feature representationMinutia descriptor evaluation
Valdes-Ramirez, D., Medina-Pérez, M. A., Monroy, R., Loyola-González, O., Rodríguez, J., Morales, A., & Herrera, F. (2019). A Review of Fingerprint Feature Representations and Their Applications for Latent Fingerprint Identification: Trends and Evaluation. IEEE Access, 7, 48484-48499.
SponsorshipThis work was supported in part by the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACYT) under Grant PN-720 and Grant 638948
Latent fingerprint identification is attracting increasing interest because of its important role in law enforcement. Although the use of various fingerprint features might be required for successful latent fingerprint identification, methods based on minutiae are often readily applicable and commonly outperform other methods. However, as many fingerprint feature representations exist, we sought to determine if the selection of feature representation has an impact on the performance of automated fingerprint identification systems. In this paper, we review the most prominent fingerprint feature representations reported in the literature, identify trends in fingerprint feature representation, and observe that representations designed for verification are commonly used in latent fingerprint identification. We aim to evaluate the performance of the most popular fingerprint feature representations over a common latent fingerprint database. Therefore, we introduce and apply a protocol that evaluates minutia descriptors for latent fingerprint identification in terms of the identification rate plotted in the cumulative match characteristic (CMC) curve. From our experiments, we found that all the evaluated minutia descriptors obtained identification rates lower than 10% for Rank-1 and 24% for Rank-100 comparing the minutiae in the database NIST SD27, illustrating the need of new minutia descriptors for latent fingerprint identification.