Late pulmonary metastases of renal cell carcinoma immediately after post-transplantation immunosuppressive treatment: a case report
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Cózar Olmo, José Manuel; Aptsiauri, Natalia; Tallada, Miguel; Garrido Torres-Puchol, Federico; Ruiz-Cabello, FranciscoEditorial
Biomed Central
Materia
Metastases Renal carcinoma Transplantation Amelogenin Cell cycle Inflammation Angiogenesis
Fecha
2008Referencia bibliográfica
Cózar, J.M; et al. Late pulmonary metastases of renal cell carcinoma immediately after post-transplantation immunosuppressive treatment: a case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports, 2: 111 (2008). [http://hdl.handle.net/10481/29166]
Patrocinador
This work was partially supported by the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (PI 02/0175), the plan Andaluz de Investigacion, and the Instituto de Salud Carlos III-Red de centros de Cancer, Spain.Resumen
Introduction
We report a case of pulmonary metastatic recurrence of renal adenocarcinoma soon after radical nephrectomy that was followed by renal transplant and immunosuppressive medication. Increased risk of metastatic recurrence of renal cell carcinoma should be considered in the immediate post-transplant period when immunosuppressive medication is administered, even if nephrectomy had been performed many years earlier. Case presentation
In 1986 the patient demonstrated renal insufficiency secondary to mesangial glomerulonephritis. In 1992 he underwent left side radical nephrectomy with histopathological diagnosis of clear cell adenocarcinoma. Mesangial glomerulonephritis in the remaining right kidney progressed to end-stage renal failure. In October 2000 he received a kidney transplant from a cadaver and commenced immunosuppressive medication. Two months later, several nodules were found in his lungs, which were identified as metastases from the primary renal tumor that had been removed with the diseased kidney 8 years earlier. Conclusion
Recurrence of renal cell carcinoma metastases points to tumor dormancy and reflects a misbalance between effective tumor immune surveillance and immune escape. This case demonstrates that a state of tumor dormancy can be interrupted soon after administration of immunosuppressant medication.