• français 
    • español
    • English
    • français
  • FacebookPinterestTwitter
  • español
  • English
  • français
Voir le document 
  •   Accueil de DIGIBUG
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Anatomía y Embriología Humana
  • DAEH - Artículos
  • Voir le document
  •   Accueil de DIGIBUG
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Anatomía y Embriología Humana
  • DAEH - Artículos
  • Voir le document
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Economic evaluation of elective single-embryo transfer with subsequent single frozen embryo transfer in an in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection program

[PDF] 68 Economic evaluation of elective single-embryo transfer with subsequent single frozen embryo transfer.pdf (567.9Ko)
Identificadores
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10481/99627
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.11.032
Exportar
RISRefworksMendeleyBibtex
Estadísticas
Statistiques d'usage de visualisation
Metadatos
Afficher la notice complète
Auteur
Hernandez-Torres, E; Navarro Espigares, José Luis; Clavero, A; Lopez-Regalado, ML; Camacho Ballesta, José Antonio; Onieva-Garcia, MA; Martinez, L; Castilla Alcalá, José Antonio
Editorial
Elsevier
Materia
Economic evaluation
 
probabilistic sensitivity analysis
 
assisted reproduction,
 
single-embryo transfer
 
Date
2015
Referencia bibliográfica
Hernandez Torres E, Navarro-Espigares JL, Clavero A, López-Regalado M, Camacho-Ballesta JA, Onieva-García M, Martínez L, Castilla JA. Economic evaluation of elective single-embryo transfer with subsequent single frozen embryo transfer in an in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection program. Fertil Steril. 2015 Mar;103(3):699-706.
Résumé
To analyze the cost-effectiveness of IVF-ICSI cycles with elective single-embryo transfer (eSET), plus elective single frozen embryo transfer (eSFET) if pregnancy is not achieved, compared with double-embryo transfer (DET). Design: Cost-effectiveness analysis. Setting: Public hospital. Patient(s): A population of 121 women (<38 years old), undergoing their first or second IVF cycles. Intervention(s): We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using the results of a prospective clinical trial. The women in group 1 received eSET plus eSFET, and those in group 2 received DET. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed. Main outcome measure(s): Live birth delivery rate. Result(s): The cumulative live birth delivery rate was 38.60% in the eSET+eSFET group versus 42.19% in the DET group. The mean costs per patient were €5,614.11 in the eSET+eSFET group and €5,562.29 in the DET group. These differences were not statistically significant. The rate of multiple gestation was significantly lower in the eSET group than in the DET group (0 vs. 25.9%). Conclusion(s): This study does not show that eSET is superior to DET in terms of effectiveness or of costs. The lack of superiority of the results for the eSET+eSFET and the DET groups corroborates that the choice of strategy to be adopted should be determined by the context of the health care system and the individual prognosis.
Colecciones
  • DAEH - Artículos

Mon compte

Ouvrir une sessionS'inscrire

Parcourir

Tout DIGIBUGCommunautés et CollectionsPar date de publicationAuteursTitresSujetsFinanciaciónPerfil de autor UGRCette collectionPar date de publicationAuteursTitresSujetsFinanciación

Statistiques

Statistiques d'usage de visualisation

Servicios

Pasos para autoarchivoAyudaLicencias Creative CommonsSHERPA/RoMEODulcinea Biblioteca UniversitariaNos puedes encontrar a través deCondiciones legales

Contactez-nous | Faire parvenir un commentaire