• español 
    • español
    • English
    • français
  • FacebookPinterestTwitter
  • español
  • English
  • français
Ver ítem 
  •   DIGIBUG Principal
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Anatomía y Embriología Humana
  • DAEH - Artículos
  • Ver ítem
  •   DIGIBUG Principal
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Anatomía y Embriología Humana
  • DAEH - Artículos
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Economic evaluation of elective single-embryo transfer with subsequent single frozen embryo transfer in an in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection program

[PDF] 68 Economic evaluation of elective single-embryo transfer with subsequent single frozen embryo transfer.pdf (567.9Kb)
Identificadores
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10481/99627
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.11.032
Exportar
RISRefworksMendeleyBibtex
Estadísticas
Ver Estadísticas de uso
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor
Hernandez-Torres, E; Navarro Espigares, José Luis; Clavero, A; Lopez-Regalado, ML; Camacho Ballesta, José Antonio; Onieva-Garcia, MA; Martinez, L; Castilla Alcalá, José Antonio
Editorial
Elsevier
Materia
Economic evaluation
 
probabilistic sensitivity analysis
 
assisted reproduction,
 
single-embryo transfer
 
Fecha
2015
Referencia bibliográfica
Hernandez Torres E, Navarro-Espigares JL, Clavero A, López-Regalado M, Camacho-Ballesta JA, Onieva-García M, Martínez L, Castilla JA. Economic evaluation of elective single-embryo transfer with subsequent single frozen embryo transfer in an in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection program. Fertil Steril. 2015 Mar;103(3):699-706.
Resumen
To analyze the cost-effectiveness of IVF-ICSI cycles with elective single-embryo transfer (eSET), plus elective single frozen embryo transfer (eSFET) if pregnancy is not achieved, compared with double-embryo transfer (DET). Design: Cost-effectiveness analysis. Setting: Public hospital. Patient(s): A population of 121 women (<38 years old), undergoing their first or second IVF cycles. Intervention(s): We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using the results of a prospective clinical trial. The women in group 1 received eSET plus eSFET, and those in group 2 received DET. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed. Main outcome measure(s): Live birth delivery rate. Result(s): The cumulative live birth delivery rate was 38.60% in the eSET+eSFET group versus 42.19% in the DET group. The mean costs per patient were €5,614.11 in the eSET+eSFET group and €5,562.29 in the DET group. These differences were not statistically significant. The rate of multiple gestation was significantly lower in the eSET group than in the DET group (0 vs. 25.9%). Conclusion(s): This study does not show that eSET is superior to DET in terms of effectiveness or of costs. The lack of superiority of the results for the eSET+eSFET and the DET groups corroborates that the choice of strategy to be adopted should be determined by the context of the health care system and the individual prognosis.
Colecciones
  • DAEH - Artículos

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Listar

Todo DIGIBUGComunidades y ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriaFinanciaciónPerfil de autor UGREsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriaFinanciación

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

Servicios

Pasos para autoarchivoAyudaLicencias Creative CommonsSHERPA/RoMEODulcinea Biblioteca UniversitariaNos puedes encontrar a través deCondiciones legales

Contacto | Sugerencias