• español 
    • español
    • English
    • français
  • FacebookPinterestTwitter
  • español
  • English
  • français
Ver ítem 
  •   DIGIBUG Principal
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Anatomía y Embriología Humana
  • DAEH - Artículos
  • Ver ítem
  •   DIGIBUG Principal
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Anatomía y Embriología Humana
  • DAEH - Artículos
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Assisted reproductive technologies in public and private clinics

[PDF] 47 Assisted reproductive technologies in public and private clinics.pdf (493.6Kb)
Identificadores
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10481/99615
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.09.028
Exportar
RISRefworksMendeleyBibtex
Estadísticas
Ver Estadísticas de uso
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor
Castilla Alcalá, José Antonio; Hernadez, E; Cabello, Y; Navarro, J; Hernandez, J; Gomez, J; Pajuelo, N; Marqueta, J; Coroleu, B
Editorial
Elsevier
Materia
assisted reproduction techniques
 
coverage
 
register data
 
Fecha
2009
Referencia bibliográfica
Castilla JA, Hernandez E, Cabello Y, Navarro JL, Hernandez J, Gomez JL, Pajuelo N, Marqueta J, Coroleu B. Assisted reproductive technologies in public and private clinics. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Dec;19(6):872-8
Resumen
The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of the type of service provided by assisted reproduction clinics. The activities, treatment patterns and results achieved by assisted reproduction centres in Spain were examined, comparing public and private clinics. A retrospective study was carried out using the Assisted Reproductive Technology Register of the Spanish Fertility Society for 2002–2004. The results showed that 74%, 96% and 99% of IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, oocyte donation and preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles, respectively, were carried out in the private sector. Public clinics performed proportionally more transfers of three embryos than the private clinics (48.1% versus 41.7%). More elective transfers were performed in private clinics. Pregnancy rates per cycle started, per puncture and per transfer were significantly higher among private than public clinics (29.1%, 32.7% and 35.9% versus 25.2%, 28.5% and 32.6%, respectively) (P < 0.05). Implantation rate has risen year on year in both types of clinic and was significantly higher (P < 0.05), every year, among the private clinics. The multiple-pregnancy rate was significantly higher among the private clinics (30.8% versus 26.4%) (P < 0.05). In conclusion, differences exist between public and private clinics as regards to their volume of activity, the range of services offered, clinical practice and results achieved.
Colecciones
  • DAEH - Artículos

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Listar

Todo DIGIBUGComunidades y ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriaFinanciaciónPerfil de autor UGREsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriaFinanciación

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

Servicios

Pasos para autoarchivoAyudaLicencias Creative CommonsSHERPA/RoMEODulcinea Biblioteca UniversitariaNos puedes encontrar a través deCondiciones legales

Contacto | Sugerencias