Assisted reproductive technologies in public and private clinics
Metadatos
Afficher la notice complèteAuteur
Castilla Alcalá, José Antonio; Hernadez, E; Cabello, Y; Navarro, J; Hernandez, J; Gomez, J; Pajuelo, N; Marqueta, J; Coroleu, BEditorial
Elsevier
Materia
assisted reproduction techniques coverage register data
Date
2009Referencia bibliográfica
Castilla JA, Hernandez E, Cabello Y, Navarro JL, Hernandez J, Gomez JL, Pajuelo N, Marqueta J, Coroleu B. Assisted reproductive technologies in public and private clinics. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Dec;19(6):872-8
Résumé
The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of the type of service provided by assisted reproduction clinics.
The activities, treatment patterns and results achieved by assisted reproduction centres in Spain were examined,
comparing public and private clinics. A retrospective study was carried out using the Assisted Reproductive
Technology Register of the Spanish Fertility Society for 2002–2004. The results showed that 74%, 96% and 99%
of IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, oocyte donation and preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles, respectively,
were carried out in the private sector. Public clinics performed proportionally more transfers of three
embryos than the private clinics (48.1% versus 41.7%). More elective transfers were performed in private clinics.
Pregnancy rates per cycle started, per puncture and per transfer were significantly higher among private than
public clinics (29.1%, 32.7% and 35.9% versus 25.2%, 28.5% and 32.6%, respectively) (P < 0.05). Implantation
rate has risen year on year in both types of clinic and was significantly higher (P < 0.05), every year, among
the private clinics. The multiple-pregnancy rate was significantly higher among the private clinics (30.8% versus
26.4%) (P < 0.05). In conclusion, differences exist between public and private clinics as regards to their volume of
activity, the range of services offered, clinical practice and results achieved.