Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Rejón, Ana Isabel
dc.contributor.authorRuiz López, María Dolores 
dc.contributor.authorWanden-Berghe, Carmina
dc.contributor.authorArtacho Martín-Lagos, Reyes 
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-10T11:45:19Z
dc.date.available2025-01-10T11:45:19Z
dc.date.issued2019-01
dc.identifier.citationPrevalence and Diagnosis of Sarcopenia in Residential Facilities: A Systematic Review. Rodríguez-Rejón AI, Ruiz-López MD, Wanden-Berghe C, Artacho R.Adv Nutr. 2019 Jan 1;10(1):51-58. [doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy058].es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/98865
dc.description.abstractAssessing sarcopenia, the age-related loss of muscle mass and function, in institutionalized older adults is a challenging task. Data on its prevalence in residential facilities are scant and highly variable. Our objective was to report the prevalence of sarcopenia in older adults living in residential facilities (nursing/long term-care homes and assisted-living facilities) and review the criteria and methodologies used to diagnose sarcopenia in this setting. Bibliographic searches were carried out in 6 electronic databases (Medline via PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, LILACS, and Cochrane) with the use of the Medical Subject Heading terms "Sarcopenia" and "Residential Facilities." We included studies that evaluated the prevalence of sarcopenia among older adults (aged ≥60 y) living in residential facilities. Forty-four studies were identified, of which 21 studies were included after applying eligibility criteria. The reported prevalence of sarcopenia ranged widely between 17.7% and 73.3% in long term-care homes and between 22% and 87% in assisted-living facilities. Most studies (n = 14) followed the consensus on sarcopenia diagnosis published by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. In the other 7 studies, sarcopenia was diagnosed according to muscle mass, which was measured via 5 different techniques, most frequently bioelectrical impedance analysis, establishing cutoff scores for low muscle mass with the use of 5 different indexes, most frequently the skeletal muscle index. There are major differences in study design, methodology, and the approach to sarcopenia diagnosis in this setting, which would, in part, explain the enormous variability in the reported prevalence data. The lack of consensus on the correct diagnostic approach hampers the implementation of appropriate nutritional interventions.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherScienceDirectes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titlePrevalence and diagnosis of sarcopenia in residential facilities: A systematic review.es_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/advances/nmy058


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional