Perceived Emotional Intelligence and Learning Strategies in Spanish University Students: A New Perspective from a Canonical Non-symmetrical Correspondence Analysis
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Vega-Hernández, María C.; Patino-Alonso, María C.; Cabello González, Rosario; Galindo-Villardón, María P.; Fernández-Berrocal, PabloEditorial
Frontiers Media
Materia
perceived emotional intelligence learning strategies canonical non-symmetrical correspondence analysis
Fecha
2017-10-27Referencia bibliográfica
Vega Hernández, M.C. et. al. Front. Psychol. 8:1888. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01888]
Resumen
Recent studies have revealed that emotional competences are relevant to the student’s
learning process and, more specifically, in the use of learning strategies (LSs). The aim
of this study is twofold. First, we aim to analyze the relationship between perceived
emotional intelligence (PEI) and LSs applying the scales TMMS-24 and Abridged ACRA
to a sample of 2334 Spanish university students, whilst also exploring possible gender
differences. Second, we aim to propose a methodological alternative based on the
Canonical non-symmetrical correspondence analysis (CNCA), as an alternative to the
methods traditionally used in Psychology and Education. Our results show that PEI has
an impact on the LS of the students. Male participants with high scores on learning
support strategies are positively related to high attention, clarity, and emotional repair.
However, the use of cognitive and control LS is related to low values on the PEI
dimensions. For women, high scores on cognitive, control, and learning support LS
are related to high emotional attention, whereas dimensions such as study habits and
learning support are related to adequate emotional repair. Participants in the 18–19
and 22–23 years age groups showed similar behavior. High scores on learning support
strategies are related to high values on three dimensions of the PEI, and high values
of study habits show high values for clarity and low values for attention and repair. The
20–21 and older than 24 years age groups behaved similarly. High scores on learning
support strategies are related to low values on clarity, and study habits show high
values for clarity and repair. This article presents the relationship between PEI and LS
in university students, the differences by gender and age, and CNCA as an alternative
method to techniques used in this field to study this association.