Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorRaya Benítez, Julia
dc.contributor.authorHeredia-Ciuró, Alejandro 
dc.contributor.authorCalvache Mateo, Andrés 
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Núñez, Javier
dc.contributor.authorValenza Peña, Geraldine
dc.contributor.authorLópez López, Laura 
dc.contributor.authorValenza, Marie Carmen 
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-11T12:06:25Z
dc.date.available2024-11-11T12:06:25Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-16
dc.identifier.citationRaya Benítez, J. et. al. International Journal of Nursing Studies 161 (2025) 104917. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104917]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/96832
dc.description.abstractBackground: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) poses a significant health risk, particularly in hospitalized patients with multiple risk factors (cigarette smoking, hypertension, diabetes and obesity). Despite advances in treatment, DVT remains a prevalent complication of hospitalization. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of non-instrumental mobilization in hospitalized patients at high risk of DVT, exploring the challenges and variations in intervention protocols. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting(s): Not applicable. Participants: Hospitalized patients at risk of deep vein thrombosis. Methods: A systematic search of three databases was conducted from interception to September 2023 for randomized controlled trials. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023460485). This study was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 statement. Two authors independently screened the studies and extracted the data. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Downs and Black checklist and GRADE system. The amount of evidence certainty was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment tool. Meta-analysis was performed addressing the incidence of deep vein thrombosis during hospitalization. Results: 7 studies were eligible for inclusion which included a total of 1774 participants. Interventions ranged from active and passive ankle exercises to walking. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significant overall effect in favor of non-instrumental early mobilization compared to usual care (RR = 0.55; 95 % CI = 0.41, 0.73; p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis comparing type of mobilization revealed significant effects for global (RR = 0.54; 95 % CI = 0.38, 0.78; p = 0.001) and remote mobilization (RR = 0.25; 95 % CI = 0.07, 0.86; p = 0.03). Conclusions: Non-instrumental early mobilization is beneficial in reducing the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in hospitalized patients.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipSpanish Ministry of Education [grant numbers FPU:19/02609, FPU:20/01670, FPU:21/00451]es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad de Granada/CBUAes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectDeep vein thrombosises_ES
dc.subjectEarly mobilizationes_ES
dc.subjectPatient admissiones_ES
dc.titleEffectiveness of non-instrumental early mobilization to reduce the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysises_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104917
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

[PDF]

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional