Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorMartínez García, Juan
dc.contributor.authorMelgosa Latorre, Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorGómez Robledo, Luis 
dc.contributor.authorLi, Changjun
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Min
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Haoxue
dc.contributor.authorCui, Guihua
dc.contributor.authorRonnier Luo, Ming
dc.contributor.authorDauser, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-30T07:37:03Z
dc.date.available2024-10-30T07:37:03Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationMartínez-García, J., Melgosa, M., Gómez-Robledo, L., Li, C., Huang, M., Liu, H., ... & Dauser, T. (2013, November). Testing the AUDI2000 colour-difference formula for solid colours using some visual datasets with usefulness to automotive industry. In 8th Iberoamerican Optics Meeting and 11th Latin American Meeting on Optics, Lasers, and Applications (Vol. 8785, pp. 882-889). SPIE.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0277-786X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/96482
dc.description.abstractColour-difference formulas are tools employed in colour industries for objective pass/fail decisions of manufactured products. These objective decisions are based on instrumental colour measurements which must reliably predict the subjective colour-difference evaluations performed by observers’ panels. In a previous paper we have tested the performance of different colour-difference formulas using the datasets employed at the development of the last CIE recommended colour-difference formula CIEDE2000, and we found that the AUDI2000 colour-difference formula for solid (homogeneous) colours performed reasonably well, despite the colour pairs in these datasets were not similar to those typically employed in the automotive industry (CIE Publication x038:2013, 465-469). Here we have tested again AUDI2000 together with 11 advanced colour-difference formulas (CIELUV, CIELAB, CMC, BFD, CIE94, CIEDE2000, CAM02-UCS, CAM02-SCD, DIN99d, DIN99b, OSA-GP-Euclidean) for three visual datasets we may consider particularly useful to the automotive industry because of different reasons: 1) 828 metallic colour pairs used to develop the highly reliable RIT-DuPont dataset (Color Res. Appl. 35, 274-283, 2010); 2) printed samples conforming 893 colour pairs with threshold colour differences (J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 29, 883-891, 2012); 3) 150 colour pairs in a tolerance dataset proposed by AUDI. To measure the relative merits of the different tested colour-difference formulas, we employed the STRESS index (J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, 1823-1829, 2007), assuming a 95% confidence level. For datasets 1) and 2), AUDI2000 was in the group of the best colour-difference formulas with no significant differences with respect to CIE94, CIEDE2000, CAM02-UCS, DIN99b and DIN99d formulas. For dataset 3) AUDI2000 provided the best results, being statistically significantly better than all other tested colour-difference formulas.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectColorimetry es_ES
dc.subjectColour-Difference Formulases_ES
dc.subjectSTRESS es_ES
dc.subjectCIE94es_ES
dc.subjectCIEDE2000es_ES
dc.subjectAUDI2000es_ES
dc.titleTesting the AUDI2000 colour-difference formula for solid colours using some visual datasets with usefulness to automotive industryes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1117/12.2026601


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

[PDF]

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional