Testing the AUDI2000 colour-difference formula for solid colours using some visual datasets with usefulness to automotive industry
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Martínez García, Juan; Melgosa Latorre, Manuel; Gómez Robledo, Luis; Li, Changjun; Huang, Min; Liu, Haoxue; Cui, Guihua; Ronnier Luo, Ming; Dauser, ThomasMateria
Colorimetry Colour-Difference Formulas STRESS CIE94 CIEDE2000 AUDI2000
Fecha
2013Referencia bibliográfica
Martínez-García, J., Melgosa, M., Gómez-Robledo, L., Li, C., Huang, M., Liu, H., ... & Dauser, T. (2013, November). Testing the AUDI2000 colour-difference formula for solid colours using some visual datasets with usefulness to automotive industry. In 8th Iberoamerican Optics Meeting and 11th Latin American Meeting on Optics, Lasers, and Applications (Vol. 8785, pp. 882-889). SPIE.
Resumen
Colour-difference formulas are tools employed in colour industries for objective pass/fail decisions of manufactured
products. These objective decisions are based on instrumental colour measurements which must reliably predict the
subjective colour-difference evaluations performed by observers’ panels. In a previous paper we have tested the
performance of different colour-difference formulas using the datasets employed at the development of the last CIE
recommended colour-difference formula CIEDE2000, and we found that the AUDI2000 colour-difference formula for
solid (homogeneous) colours performed reasonably well, despite the colour pairs in these datasets were not similar to
those typically employed in the automotive industry (CIE Publication x038:2013, 465-469). Here we have tested again
AUDI2000 together with 11 advanced colour-difference formulas (CIELUV, CIELAB, CMC, BFD, CIE94,
CIEDE2000, CAM02-UCS, CAM02-SCD, DIN99d, DIN99b, OSA-GP-Euclidean) for three visual datasets we may
consider particularly useful to the automotive industry because of different reasons: 1) 828 metallic colour pairs used to
develop the highly reliable RIT-DuPont dataset (Color Res. Appl. 35, 274-283, 2010); 2) printed samples conforming
893 colour pairs with threshold colour differences (J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 29, 883-891, 2012); 3) 150 colour pairs in a
tolerance dataset proposed by AUDI. To measure the relative merits of the different tested colour-difference formulas,
we employed the STRESS index (J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, 1823-1829, 2007), assuming a 95% confidence level. For
datasets 1) and 2), AUDI2000 was in the group of the best colour-difference formulas with no significant differences
with respect to CIE94, CIEDE2000, CAM02-UCS, DIN99b and DIN99d formulas. For dataset 3) AUDI2000 provided
the best results, being statistically significantly better than all other tested colour-difference formulas.





