Relationship between Leadership and Emotional Intelligence in Teachers in Universities and Other Educational Centres: A Structural Equation Model
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Zurita Ortega, Félix; Olmedo Moreno, Eva María; Chacón Cuberos, Ramón; Expósito López, Jorge; Martínez Martínez, AsunciónEditorial
MDPI
Materia
Leadership Emotional intelligence Teaching
Fecha
2019-12-31Referencia bibliográfica
Zurita-Ortega, F.; Olmedo-Moreno, E.M.; Chacón-Cuberos, R.; Expósito López, J.; Martínez-Martínez, A. Relationship between Leadership and Emotional Intelligence in Teachers in Universities and Other Educational Centres: A Structural Equation Model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010293
Patrocinador
Research group HUM-983 (ÍTACA) of the University of Granada (Spain)Resumen
This study uses an explanatory model of the dimensions of leadership and emotional
intelligence according to the methods used in particular teaching environments (universities and
other educational institutions). The effect of different kinds of leadership on emotional intelligence
dimensions is also established using an explanatory model. A total of 954 teachers participated in this
cross-sectional study, teaching in 137 different schools/universities. The instruments used for the data
collection were the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ-5) and the Trait Meta Mood Scale
(TMMS-24). Data analysis was performed with the software IBM AMOS 23.0. (International Business
Machines Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) using multi-group analysis and structural equations.
Results showed that the structural equation model had a good fit. Transformational leadership
depends mainly on intellectual stimulation in university teachers, whereas intrinsic motivation is more
relevant at the lower educational levels. In relation to transactional leadership, contingency reward
has a greater regression weight in non-university education, whereas passive leadership is governed
more by passive exception in university teachers. There was a positive and direct relationship
between levels of emotional intelligence and transformational leadership in non-university teachers,
which reveals the need for effective understanding and management of both one’s own and students’
emotions in order to act effectively as a leader. Transactional leadership was negatively related to
some emotional intelligence dimensions, given the relevance of obtaining power in this dimension.