Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMíguez Salas, Olmo 
dc.contributor.authorBrandt, Angelika
dc.contributor.authorKnauber, Henry
dc.contributor.authorRiehl, Torben
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-03T11:26:48Z
dc.date.available2024-09-03T11:26:48Z
dc.date.issued2024-02-01
dc.identifier.citationMiguez Salas, O. et. al. Biogeosciences, 21, 641–655. [https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-641-2024]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/93853
dc.description.abstractIn the deep sea, interactions between benthic fauna and seafloor sediment primarily occur through bioturbation that can be preserved as traces (i.e. lebensspuren). Lebensspuren are common features of deep-sea landscapes and are more abundant than the organisms that produce them (i.e. tracemakers), rendering lebensspuren promising proxies for inferring biodiversity. The density and diversity relationships between lebensspuren and benthic fauna remain unclear, and contradicting correlations have been proposed (i.e. negative, positive, or even null correlations). To approach these variable correlations, lebensspuren and benthic fauna were characterized taxonomically at eight deep-sea stations in the Kuril-Kamchatka Trench area, together with two novel categories: tracemakers (specific epibenthic fauna that produce these traces) and degrading fauna (benthic fauna that can erase lebensspuren). No general correlation (overall study area) was observed between diversities of lebensspuren, tracemakers, degrading fauna, and fauna. However, a diversity correlation was observed at specific stations, showing both negative and positive correlations depending on: (1) the number of unknown tracemakers (especially significant for dwelling lebensspuren); (2) the lebensspuren with multiple origins; and (3) tracemakers that can produce different lebensspuren. Lebensspuren and faunal density were not correlated. However, lebensspuren density was either positively or negatively correlated with tracemaker densities, depending on the lebensspuren morphotypes. A positive correlation was observed for resting lebensspuren (e.g. ophiuroid impressions, Actiniaria circular impressions), while negative correlations were observed for locomotion-feeding lebensspuren (e.g. echinoid trails). In conclusion, lebensspuren diversity may be a good proxy for tracemaker biodiversity when the lebensspuren–tracemaker relationship can be reliable characterized. Lebensspuren–density correlations vary depending on the specific lebensspuren residence time, tracemaker density, and associated behaviour (rate of movement). Overall, we suggest that lebensspuren density and diversity correlations should be studied with tracemakers rather than with general benthic fauna. On a global scale, abiotic (e.g. hydrodynamics, substrate consistency) and other biotic factors (e.g. microbial degradation) may also play an important role.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) project (PTJ, Grant 03G0223A to Angelika Brandt)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipAlexander von Humboldt-Stiftung (grant no. Olmo Miguez-Salas Postdoctoral Fellow)es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherEGUes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleDiversity and density relationships between lebensspuren and tracemaking organisms: a study case from abyssal northwest Pacifices_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/bg-21-641-2024
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución 4.0 Internacional