Diversity and density relationships between lebensspuren and tracemaking organisms: a study case from abyssal northwest Pacific
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
EGU
Fecha
2024-02-01Referencia bibliográfica
Miguez Salas, O. et. al. Biogeosciences, 21, 641–655. [https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-641-2024]
Patrocinador
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) project (PTJ, Grant 03G0223A to Angelika Brandt); Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung (grant no. Olmo Miguez-Salas Postdoctoral Fellow)Resumen
In the deep sea, interactions between benthic
fauna and seafloor sediment primarily occur through bioturbation
that can be preserved as traces (i.e. lebensspuren).
Lebensspuren are common features of deep-sea landscapes
and are more abundant than the organisms that produce
them (i.e. tracemakers), rendering lebensspuren promising
proxies for inferring biodiversity. The density and diversity
relationships between lebensspuren and benthic fauna
remain unclear, and contradicting correlations have been
proposed (i.e. negative, positive, or even null correlations).
To approach these variable correlations, lebensspuren and
benthic fauna were characterized taxonomically at eight
deep-sea stations in the Kuril-Kamchatka Trench area, together
with two novel categories: tracemakers (specific
epibenthic fauna that produce these traces) and degrading
fauna (benthic fauna that can erase lebensspuren). No
general correlation (overall study area) was observed between
diversities of lebensspuren, tracemakers, degrading
fauna, and fauna. However, a diversity correlation was
observed at specific stations, showing both negative and
positive correlations depending on: (1) the number of
unknown tracemakers (especially significant for dwelling
lebensspuren); (2) the lebensspuren with multiple origins;
and (3) tracemakers that can produce different lebensspuren.
Lebensspuren and faunal density were not correlated. However,
lebensspuren density was either positively or negatively
correlated with tracemaker densities, depending on
the lebensspuren morphotypes. A positive correlation was
observed for resting lebensspuren (e.g. ophiuroid impressions,
Actiniaria circular impressions), while negative correlations
were observed for locomotion-feeding lebensspuren
(e.g. echinoid trails). In conclusion, lebensspuren diversity
may be a good proxy for tracemaker biodiversity when the
lebensspuren–tracemaker relationship can be reliable characterized.
Lebensspuren–density correlations vary depending
on the specific lebensspuren residence time, tracemaker
density, and associated behaviour (rate of movement). Overall,
we suggest that lebensspuren density and diversity correlations
should be studied with tracemakers rather than with
general benthic fauna. On a global scale, abiotic (e.g. hydrodynamics,
substrate consistency) and other biotic factors
(e.g. microbial degradation) may also play an important role.





