Using Resistance-Band Tests to Evaluate Trunk Muscle Strength in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Test–Retest Reliability Study
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Franco-López, Francisco; Durkalec-Michalski, Krzysztof; Díaz Morón, Jesús; Higueras-Liébana, Enrique; Hernández-Belmonte, Alejandro; Courel Ibáñez, JavierEditorial
MDPI
Materia
musculoskeletal pain physical fitness spine
Fecha
2024-06-25Referencia bibliográfica
Franco, López, F. et. al. Sensors 2024, 24, 4131. [https://doi.org/10.3390/s24134131]
Patrocinador
Research Transfer Office of the University of Murcia (R-1471/2019); Exchange Programme for Scientists as part of bilateral cooperation (project No. BPN/BIL/2021/1/00108/U/00001) financed by The Polish National Agency for Academic ExchangeResumen
Exercise is a front-line intervention to increase functional capacity and reduce pain and
disability in people with low strength levels or disorders. However, there is a lack of validated
field-based tests to check the initial status and, more importantly, to control the process and make
tailored adjustments in load, intensity, and recovery. We aimed to determine the test–retest reliability
of a submaximal, resistance-band test to evaluate the strength of the trunk stability muscles using a
portable force sensor in middle-aged adults (48 ± 13 years) with medically diagnosed chronic low
back pain and healthy peers (n = 35). Participants completed two submaximal progressive tests of two
resistance-band exercises (unilateral row and Pallof press), consisting of 5 s maintained contraction,
progressively increasing the load. The test stopped when deviation from the initial position by
compensation movements occurred. Trunk muscle strength (CORE muscles) was monitored in real
time using a portable force sensor (strain gauge). Results revealed that both tests were highly reliable
(intra-class correlation [ICC] > 0.901) and presented low errors and coefficients of variation (CV)
in both groups. In particular, people with low back pain had errors of 14–19 N (CV = 9–12%) in
the unilateral row test and 13–19 N (CV = 8–12%) in the Pallof press. No discomfort or pain was
reported during or after the tests. These two easy-to-use and technology-based tests result in a reliable
and objective screening tool to evaluate the strength and trunk stability in middle-aged adults with
chronic low back pain, considering an error of measurement < 20 N. This contribution may have an
impact on improving the individualization and control of rehabilitation or physical training in people
with lumbar injuries or disorders.





