Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorMellado García, Elena
dc.contributor.authorDíaz Rodríguez, Consuelo Lourdes 
dc.contributor.authorCortés Martín, Jonathan 
dc.contributor.authorSánchez García, Juan Carlos 
dc.contributor.authorPiqueras Sola, Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorHiguero Macías, Juan Carlos
dc.contributor.authorRivas-Ruiz, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Blanque, Raquel 
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-30T11:01:51Z
dc.date.available2024-07-30T11:01:51Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-15
dc.identifier.citationMellado García, E. et. al. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 3517. [https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13123517]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/93639
dc.description.abstractHydrotherapy, including the use of therapeutic showers and bathtubs, has been studied for its potential benefits in labor pain management. Previous research has indicated that hydrotherapy can alleviate pain, but comparative studies between therapeutic showers and bathtubs are scarce. Objective: This study aims to compare the effects of therapeutic showers and bathtubs on pain perception, labor duration, use of epidural analgesia, and maternal and neonatal outcomes during labor. Methods: A total of 124 pregnant women were included in this study. Participants were divided into two groups: those who used a therapeutic shower and those who used a bathtub during labor. Pain levels were measured using a visual analog scale (VAS). Labor duration, use of epidural analgesia, types of delivery, maternal outcomes (postpartum hemorrhage, perineal status, maternal hypotension, fever, and breastfeeding), and neonatal outcomes (APGAR scores, fetal heart rate, complications, and neonatal unit admissions) were recorded and analyzed. Results: Both the therapeutic shower and the bathtub effectively reduced pain perception, with the bathtub showing a greater reduction in VAS scores. The therapeutic shower group experienced a significantly shorter labor duration compared to the bathtub group. The majority of participants in both groups did not require epidural analgesia, with no significant differences between the groups. There were no significant differences in the types of delivery. Maternal outcomes indicated a lower incidence of perineal tears and episiotomies in the therapeutic shower group. Neonatal outcomes, including APGAR scores and fetal heart rate, were similar between the groups, with no significant differences in complications or neonatal unit admissions. Conclusions: Both therapeutic showers and bathtubs are effective for pain relief during labor, with the bathtub showing a higher reduction in pain intensity. The therapeutic shower is associated with a shorter labor duration and a lower incidence of perineal tears and episiotomies. Both methods are safe for neonatal well-being, making hydrotherapy a viable non-pharmacological option for pain management in labor. However, the therapeutic shower may offer additional benefits in terms of labor duration and maternal outcomes.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjecthydrotherapy es_ES
dc.subjectwaterbirthes_ES
dc.subjectimmersiones_ES
dc.titleComparative Analysis of Therapeutic Showers and Bathtubs for Pain Management and Labor Outcomes—A Retrospective Cohort Studyes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm13123517
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

[PDF]

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Atribución 4.0 Internacional