Comparative Analysis of Therapeutic Showers and Bathtubs for Pain Management and Labor Outcomes—A Retrospective Cohort Study
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Mellado García, Elena; Díaz Rodríguez, Consuelo Lourdes; Cortés Martín, Jonathan; Sánchez García, Juan Carlos; Piqueras Sola, Beatriz; Higuero Macías, Juan Carlos; Rivas-Ruiz, Francisco; Rodríguez Blanque, RaquelEditorial
MDPI
Materia
hydrotherapy waterbirth immersion
Fecha
2024-06-15Referencia bibliográfica
Mellado García, E. et. al. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 3517. [https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13123517]
Resumen
Hydrotherapy, including the use of therapeutic showers and bathtubs, has been studied for
its potential benefits in labor pain management. Previous research has indicated that hydrotherapy
can alleviate pain, but comparative studies between therapeutic showers and bathtubs are scarce.
Objective: This study aims to compare the effects of therapeutic showers and bathtubs on pain
perception, labor duration, use of epidural analgesia, and maternal and neonatal outcomes during
labor. Methods: A total of 124 pregnant women were included in this study. Participants were
divided into two groups: those who used a therapeutic shower and those who used a bathtub
during labor. Pain levels were measured using a visual analog scale (VAS). Labor duration, use of
epidural analgesia, types of delivery, maternal outcomes (postpartum hemorrhage, perineal status,
maternal hypotension, fever, and breastfeeding), and neonatal outcomes (APGAR scores, fetal heart
rate, complications, and neonatal unit admissions) were recorded and analyzed. Results: Both the
therapeutic shower and the bathtub effectively reduced pain perception, with the bathtub showing a
greater reduction in VAS scores. The therapeutic shower group experienced a significantly shorter
labor duration compared to the bathtub group. The majority of participants in both groups did
not require epidural analgesia, with no significant differences between the groups. There were no
significant differences in the types of delivery. Maternal outcomes indicated a lower incidence of
perineal tears and episiotomies in the therapeutic shower group. Neonatal outcomes, including
APGAR scores and fetal heart rate, were similar between the groups, with no significant differences in
complications or neonatal unit admissions. Conclusions: Both therapeutic showers and bathtubs are
effective for pain relief during labor, with the bathtub showing a higher reduction in pain intensity.
The therapeutic shower is associated with a shorter labor duration and a lower incidence of perineal
tears and episiotomies. Both methods are safe for neonatal well-being, making hydrotherapy a viable
non-pharmacological option for pain management in labor. However, the therapeutic shower may
offer additional benefits in terms of labor duration and maternal outcomes.