Are you sure it’s an artifact? Artifact detection and uncertainty quantification in histological images
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Kanwal, Neel; López Pérez, Miguel; Kiraz, Umay; Zuiverloon, Tahlita C. M.; Molina Soriano, Rafael; Engan, KjerstiEditorial
Elsevier
Materia
Artifact detection Computational pathology Deep learning
Fecha
2023-12-20Referencia bibliográfica
Kanwal, Neel, et al. Are you sure it’s an artifact? Artifact detection and uncertainty quantification in histological images. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 112 (2024) 102321 [10.1016/j.compmedimag.2023.102321]
Patrocinador
Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER)/Junta de Andalucía-Consejería de Transformación Económica, Industria, Conocimiento y Universidades, under Grant B-TIC-324-UGR20; Project PID2022-140189OBC22 funded by MCIN/AEI /10.13039/501100011033 and FEDER; CLARIFY is the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska Curie grant agreement No 860627; University of Granada postdoctoral program ‘‘Contrato Puente’’Resumen
Modern cancer diagnostics involves extracting tissue specimens from suspicious areas and conducting histotechnical
procedures to prepare a digitized glass slide, called Whole Slide Image (WSI), for further examination.
These procedures frequently introduce different types of artifacts in the obtained WSI, and histological artifacts
might influence Computational Pathology (CPATH) systems further down to a diagnostic pipeline if not
excluded or handled. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNNs) have achieved promising results for the
detection of some WSI artifacts, however, they do not incorporate uncertainty in their predictions. This paper
proposes an uncertainty-aware Deep Kernel Learning (DKL) model to detect blurry areas and folded tissues,
two types of artifacts that can appear in WSIs. The proposed probabilistic model combines a CNN feature
extractor and a sparse Gaussian Processes (GPs) classifier, which improves the performance of current state-of-the-art artifact detection DCNNs and provides uncertainty estimates. We achieved 0.996 and 0.938 F1 scores
for blur and folded tissue detection on unseen data, respectively. In extensive experiments, we validated the
DKL model on unseen data from external independent cohorts with different staining and tissue types, where
it outperformed DCNNs. Interestingly, the DKL model is more confident in the correct predictions and less in
the wrong ones. The proposed DKL model can be integrated into the preprocessing pipeline of CPATH systems
to provide reliable predictions and possibly serve as a quality control tool.