Bidding for B2B or B2G tenders: toward the adoption of pricing models in practice
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
Springer Nature
Materia
Competitive bidding Tendering B2B pricing
Fecha
2024-04-29Referencia bibliográfica
Herrmann, H., Cobo Martín, M.J. Bidding for B2B or B2G tenders: toward the adoption of pricing models in practice. Manag Rev Q (2024). [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00424-1]
Resumen
This study investigates the lack of adoption of pricing models for tenders in business-
to-business (B2B) and business-to-government (B2G) markets. We aim to
identify the gaps between research and practice and propose a future research agenda
to bridge these gaps. Our study contributes in three ways: First, we outline how our
research agenda can influence the adoption of pricing models across specific practitioner
roles in tendering. Second, we introduce systematic science mapping (SSM)
as a novel methodology for literature reviews. SSM combines a systematic review
and science mapping in a multi-stage, mixed-methods research design. We chart the
evolution of 1042 research publications from 1956 to 2022 into three thematic areas.
Our review of 163 gray literature publications reveals seven schools of thought on
tender price modeling and the causes of theory-to-practice gaps. Finally, we introduce
a new metric, the mapping factor (MAPF), as a robustness indicator for systematic
literature reviews.