Systematic Reviews and Synthesis without Meta-Analysis on Hydrotherapy for Pain Control in Labor
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor
Mellado-Garcia, Elena; Díaz Rodríguez, Consuelo Lourdes; Cortés Martín, Jonathan; Sánchez García, Juan Carlos; Piqueras Sola, Beatriz; Higuero Macías, Juan Carlos; Rodríguez Blanque, RaquelEditorial
MDPI
Materia
Water immersion Labor stage Second
Date
2024-02-01Referencia bibliográfica
Mellado-García, E.; Díaz-Rodríguez, L.; Cortés-Martín, J.; Sánchez-García, J.C.; Piqueras-Sola, B.; Higuero Macías, J.C.; Rodríguez- Blanque, R. Systematic Reviews and Synthesis without Meta-Analysis on Hydrotherapy for Pain Control in Labor. Healthcare 2024, 12, 373. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12030373
Abstract
Background: Although there is scientific evidence regarding the use of water immersion
during labor, this evidence is primarily focused on the first stage of labor. There is limited scientific
evidence on water immersion during the second stage of labor. Objective: The objective of this
study was to conduct a comprehensive systematic review and synthesis of contemporary evidence
related to water birth, with a specific focus on the second stage of labor. Methods: A systematic
review of the scientific literature published between January 2018 and October 2023 was carried out.
A synthesis of the results was conducted following the Synthesis without Meta-Analysis (SWiM)
guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were utilized as information sources. The
search strategy was designed using the keywords “immersion” and “parturition”, along with their
relevant synonyms. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies employing randomized controlled trials
(RCTs), systematic reviews, and quantitative and qualitative approaches focusing on pregnant women
undergoing water immersion at any stage of the labor process. Results: Eleven articles were selected:
two systematic reviews (one quantitative and one qualitative), five cohort studies, one case–control
study, one cross-sectional observational study, and two qualitative studies. A thorough assessment
of the methodology was performed using several specific tools: the Cochrane RoB 2 (Risk of Bias 2)
tool for systematic reviews, JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research for qualitative
studies, STROBE for observational descriptive studies, and CASPe for qualitative studies. The results
provided fundamental insights that will contribute to conceptual standardization regarding the effects
of water birth on maternal and fetal health. Additionally, a synthesis of the results was performed
concerning types of delivery, analgesia use, pain perception, and maternal satisfaction with the
water birth experience. Conclusions: In this study, we conclude that the results regarding delivery
types, labor durations, and analgesia use found in the literature, along with statistically significant
maternal/fetal effects, are crucial for making recommendations regarding the use of water during
labor in any of its stages if the woman desires it safely.