Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMellado-Garcia, Elena
dc.contributor.authorDíaz Rodríguez, Consuelo Lourdes 
dc.contributor.authorCortés Martín, Jonathan 
dc.contributor.authorSánchez García, Juan Carlos 
dc.contributor.authorPiqueras Sola, Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorHiguero Macías, Juan Carlos
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Blanque, Raquel 
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-13T10:46:56Z
dc.date.available2024-05-13T10:46:56Z
dc.date.issued2024-02-01
dc.identifier.citationMellado-García, E.; Díaz-Rodríguez, L.; Cortés-Martín, J.; Sánchez-García, J.C.; Piqueras-Sola, B.; Higuero Macías, J.C.; Rodríguez- Blanque, R. Systematic Reviews and Synthesis without Meta-Analysis on Hydrotherapy for Pain Control in Labor. Healthcare 2024, 12, 373. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12030373es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/91715
dc.description.abstractBackground: Although there is scientific evidence regarding the use of water immersion during labor, this evidence is primarily focused on the first stage of labor. There is limited scientific evidence on water immersion during the second stage of labor. Objective: The objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive systematic review and synthesis of contemporary evidence related to water birth, with a specific focus on the second stage of labor. Methods: A systematic review of the scientific literature published between January 2018 and October 2023 was carried out. A synthesis of the results was conducted following the Synthesis without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were utilized as information sources. The search strategy was designed using the keywords “immersion” and “parturition”, along with their relevant synonyms. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies employing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, and quantitative and qualitative approaches focusing on pregnant women undergoing water immersion at any stage of the labor process. Results: Eleven articles were selected: two systematic reviews (one quantitative and one qualitative), five cohort studies, one case–control study, one cross-sectional observational study, and two qualitative studies. A thorough assessment of the methodology was performed using several specific tools: the Cochrane RoB 2 (Risk of Bias 2) tool for systematic reviews, JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research for qualitative studies, STROBE for observational descriptive studies, and CASPe for qualitative studies. The results provided fundamental insights that will contribute to conceptual standardization regarding the effects of water birth on maternal and fetal health. Additionally, a synthesis of the results was performed concerning types of delivery, analgesia use, pain perception, and maternal satisfaction with the water birth experience. Conclusions: In this study, we conclude that the results regarding delivery types, labor durations, and analgesia use found in the literature, along with statistically significant maternal/fetal effects, are crucial for making recommendations regarding the use of water during labor in any of its stages if the woman desires it safely.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectWater immersiones_ES
dc.subjectLabor stagees_ES
dc.subjectSecondes_ES
dc.titleSystematic Reviews and Synthesis without Meta-Analysis on Hydrotherapy for Pain Control in Labores_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/healthcare12030373
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución 4.0 Internacional