Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorTurner-Zwinkels, Felicity M.
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Sánchez, Efraín 
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-28T10:24:12Z
dc.date.available2023-09-28T10:24:12Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-21
dc.identifier.citationTurner-Zwinkels, F. M., van Noord, J., Kesberg, R., García-Sánchez, E., Brandt, M. J., Kuppens, T., Easterbrook, M. J., Smets, L., Gorska, P., Marchlewska, M., & Turner-Zwinkels, T. (2023). Affective Polarization and Political Belief Systems: The Role of Political Identity and the Content and Structure of Political Beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 0(0). [https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231183935]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/84713
dc.descriptionThe author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work is financially supported by the NORFACE Joint Research Programme on Democratic Governance in a Turbulent Age and co-funded by NWO, ESRC, AEI, NSC, FWO, and the European Commission through Horizon 2020 under grant agreement number 822166.es_ES
dc.description.abstractWe investigate the extent that political identity, political belief content (i.e., attitude stances), and political belief system structure (i.e., relations among attitudes) differences are associated with affective polarization (i.e., viewing ingroup partisans positively and outgroup partisans negatively) in two multinational, cross-sectional studies (Study 1 N = 4,152, Study 2 N = 29,994). First, we found a large, positive association between political identity and group liking-participants liked their ingroup substantially more than their outgroup. Second, political belief system content and structure had opposite associations with group liking: Sharing similar belief system content with an outgroup was associated with more outgroup liking, but similarity with the ingroup was associated with less ingroup liking. The opposite pattern was found for political belief system structure. Thus, affective polarization was greatest when belief system content similarity was low and structure similarity was high.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipNORFACE Joint Research Programme on Democratic Governance in a Turbulent Agees_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipNetherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipUK Research & Innovation (UKRI) Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipAEIes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipMinistry of Science and Technology, Taiwanes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFWOes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commission Horizon 2020: 822166es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSagees_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectAffective polarizationes_ES
dc.subjectPolitical belief systemses_ES
dc.subjectPolitical attitudeses_ES
dc.subjectPolitical identityes_ES
dc.titleAffective Polarization and Political Belief Systems: The Role of Political Identity and the Content and Structure of Political Beliefses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/822166es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/01461672231183935
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional