Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGalli, Tamas
dc.contributor.authorChiclana Parrilla, Francisco 
dc.contributor.authorSiewe, Francois
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-18T10:24:13Z
dc.date.available2023-07-18T10:24:13Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-28
dc.identifier.citationGalli, T.; Chiclana, F.; Siewe, F. Practical Consequences of Quality Views in Assessing Software Quality. Axioms 2023, 12, 529. [https:// doi.org/10.3390/axioms12060529]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/83839
dc.description.abstractThe authors’ previously published research delved into the theory of software product quality modelling, model views, concepts, and terminologies. They also analysed this specific field from the point of view of uncertainty, and possible descriptions based on fuzzy set theory and fuzzy logic. Laying a theoretical foundation was necessary; however, software professionals need a more tangible and practical approach for their everyday work. Consequently, the authors devote this paper to filling in this gap; it aims to illustrate how to interpret and utilise the previous findings, including the established taxonomy of the software product quality models. The developed fuzzy model’s simplification is also presented with a Generalized Additive Model approximation. The paper does not require any formal knowledge of uncertainty computations and reasoning under uncertainty, nor does it need a deep understanding of quality modelling in terms of terminology, concepts, and meta-models, which were necessary to prepare the taxonomy and relevance ranking. The paper investigates how to determine the validity of statements based on a given software product quality model; moreover, it considers how to tailor and adjust quality models to the particular project’s needs. The paper also describes how to apply different software product quality models for different quality views to take advantage of the automation potential offered for the measurement and assessment of source code quality. Furthermore, frequent pitfalls are illustrated with their corresponding resolutions, including an unmeasured quality property that is found to be important and needs to be included in the measurement and assessment process.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectSoftware product quality modeles_ES
dc.subjectQuality assessmentes_ES
dc.subjectQuality viewes_ES
dc.subjectTailoring qualityes_ES
dc.subjectModelses_ES
dc.subjectSQALEes_ES
dc.subjectGeneralized Additive Modeles_ES
dc.subjectGAMes_ES
dc.titlePractical Consequences of Quality Views in Assessing Software Qualityes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/axioms12060529
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución 4.0 Internacional