Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Intentional bounded rationality methodology to assess the quality of decision-making approaches with latent alternative performances
dc.contributor.author | Sáenz Royo, Carlos | |
dc.contributor.author | Chiclana Parrilla, Francisco | |
dc.contributor.author | Herrera Viedma, Enrique | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-04T11:48:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-04T11:48:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-08-20 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Carlos Sáenz-Royo, Francisco Chiclana, Enrique Herrera-Viedma, Intentional bounded rationality methodology to assess the quality of decision-making approaches with latent alternative performances, Information Fusion, Volume 89, 2023, Pages 254-266, ISSN 1566-2535, [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2022.08.019] | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10481/77168 | |
dc.description.abstract | Expert’s judgments have been crucial in the development of decision theory; however, what criterion to use in the selection of experts remains an issue to address. Decision support techniques proposed to improve the quality of expert judgment decision making consider a demonstrated inconsistency of the judgments expressed by an expert as a criterion of exclusion in the decision-making process of such expert. Although consistency appears to be a desirable condition to qualify as “expert”, little is known about the quality of the decisions made imposing consistency as the expert qualifying condition. This paper proposes a simulation methodology, based on an automaton programmed to make decisions in an intended but bounded rational way, to assess the cost-benefit of different aspects of decision support techniques. Within this methodology, the imposition of the consistency condition in the selection of experts is studied. In particular, the paper shows with a case study example that the Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) decision support technique expected payoff is at most 5% higher when implementing Saaty’s consistency criterion of the expert’s judgments than when the consistency criterion is not considered. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | Spanish Government ECO2017-86305-C4-3-R | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | Gobierno de Aragon | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | European Social Fund (ESF) | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | Spanish Government PID2019-103880RB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | es_ES |
dc.rights | Atribución 4.0 Internacional | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Analysis of decision support techniques | es_ES |
dc.subject | Inconsistency | es_ES |
dc.subject | Error | es_ES |
dc.subject | Intentional bounded rationality methodology | es_ES |
dc.title | Intentional bounded rationality methodology to assess the quality of decision-making approaches with latent alternative performances | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.inffus.2022.08.019 | |
dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |