Characterizing Unaccompanied Foreign Minors: Educational Level and Length of Stay as Individual Difference Factors That Impact Academic Self-Efficacy
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Olmos Gómez, María Del Carmen; Pistón Rodríguez, María Dolores; Chacón Cuberos, Ramón; Romero Díaz de la Guardia, José Javier; Cuevas Rincón, Jesús Manuel; Olmedo Moreno, Eva MaríaEditorial
Frontiers
Materia
Academic self-efficacy Multilevel analysis Inclusion Socio-economic policies Social development Vulnerable groups
Fecha
2022-02-15Referencia bibliográfica
Olmos-Gómez MdC... [et al.] (2022) Characterizing Unaccompanied Foreign Minors: Educational Level and Length of Stay as Individual Difference Factors That Impact Academic Self-Efficacy. Front. Psychol. 13:780488. doi: [10.3389/fpsyg.2022.780488]
Patrocinador
TRANSFORMACION DE LOS APRENDIZAJES EN CONTEXTOS HIBRIDOS PARA LA INCLUSION EDUCATIVA Y LABORAL DE SECTORES ESPECIALMENTE VULNERABLES CON ENFASIS EN MENAS by MCIN /AEI PID2020-119194RB-I00; MCIN /AEI/10.13039/501100011033Resumen
The aim of the present study is to analyze individual differences in academic self-efficacy
within a population of Unaccompanied Foreign Minors (UFM) from the European cities of
Ceuta and Melilla (Spain). Variables describing educational level and length of stay were
considered in a sample of 377 individuals being cared for in different youth centers.
Of these, 63.4% belonged to the group who had stayed at the center for less than
9 months and 36.6% reported a length of stay of more than 9 months. The age of
participants ranged between 8 and 17 years old (M = 14.87 years). Once the quality
parameters of the instrument (academic self-efficacy) were elaborated, reliability and
validity was confirmed through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) using Structural
Equation Modeling (SEM) methodology. Data collection was then initiated. The results
overall indicate that 87.6% of those who completed the questionnaire reported a
higher level of self-efficacy with regards to working with any classmate, whilst at the
same time seeing themselves as capable of achieving good marks. ANOVA results
indicated significant differences with respect to educational level and length of stay.
In this regard, students who had received professional training and had been at the
Center for more than 9 months, were the ones who developed greater academic
self-efficacy for spending more time working when tasks were judged to be difficult.
The results obtained demonstrate that any intervention will be positive as long as it
promotes different institutions to develop strategies that cater to a length of stay of
more than 9 months and target education, academic self-efficacy, socialization and
strengthening the future workforce. Such interventions can be directed through new
European, Spanish or local level policies. It is clear that institutions still have a lot of work
left to do.