Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBuendía, Víctor
dc.contributor.authordi Santo, Serena
dc.contributor.authorVillegas, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorBurioni, Raffaella
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz García, Miguel Ángel 
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-15T11:11:07Z
dc.date.available2021-02-15T11:11:07Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-16
dc.identifier.citationBuendía, V., di Santo, S., Villegas, P., Burioni, R., & Muñoz, M. A. (2020). Self-organized bistability and its possible relevance for brain dynamics. Physical Review Research, 2(1), 013318. [DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013318]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/66561
dc.description.abstractSelf-organized bistability (SOB) is the counterpart of “self-organized criticality” (SOC), for systems tuning themselves to the edge of bistability of a discontinuous phase transition, rather than to the critical point of a continuous one. The equations defining the mathematical theory of SOB turn out to bear a strong resemblance to a (Landau-Ginzburg) theory recently proposed to analyze the dynamics of the cerebral cortex. This theory describes the neuronal activity of coupled mesoscopic patches of cortex, homeostatically regulated by short-term synaptic plasticity. The theory for cortex dynamics entails, however, some significant differences with respect to SOB, including the lack of a (bulk) conservation law, the absence of a perfect separation of timescales and, the fact that in the former, but not in the second, there is a parameter that controls the overall system state (in blatant contrast with the very idea of self-organization). Here, we scrutinize—by employing a combination of analytical and computational tools—the analogies and differences between both theories and explore whether in some limit SOB can play an important role to explain the emergence of scale-invariant neuronal avalanches observed empirically in the cortex. We conclude that, actually, in the limit of infinitely slow synaptic dynamics, the two theories become identical but the timescales required for the self-organization mechanism to be effective do not seem to be biologically plausible. We discuss the key differences between self-organization mechanisms with/without conservation and with/without infinitely separated timescales. In particular, we introduce the concept of “self-organized collective oscillations” and scrutinize the implications of our findings in neuroscience, shedding new light into the problems of scale invariance and oscillations in cortical dynamics.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipSpanish Ministry and Agencia Estatal de investigación (AEI) FIS2017-84256Pes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipJunta de Andalucíaes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Union (EU) SOMM17/6105/UGRes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipCariparma through the TEACH IN PARMA projectes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherAmer Physical Soces_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.titleSelf-organized bistability and its possible relevance for brain dynamicses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013318
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución 3.0 España
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución 3.0 España