Europe 2020 strategy: a strategy for which type of growth?
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10481/31460Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
Universidad de Granada. Departamento de Teoría e Historia Económica
Materia
Inequality Composite index Mediation analysis Crisis Life satisfaction Human development
Fecha
2013-12Referencia bibliográfica
Ruiz Martos, M.J.; Sánchez Domínguez, A. Europe 2020 strategy: a strategy for which type of growth? Universidad de Granada. Departamento de Teoría e Historia Económica (2013). (The Papers; 13/11). [http://hdl.handle.net/10481/31460]
Resumen
This paper constructs an index that synthesizes the eight targets of the EU 2020
Strategy into a one-dimensional target –EU 2020 synthetic target- and the situation of
each EU28 Member States (the current 27 Members plus Croatia) in 2011 with respect
to them –2011 synthetic situation-. Hence we can measure the distance of each EU
Member State synthetic situation in 2011 to the EU 2020 synthetic target. We find that
none of the Member States meets the EU 2020 synthetic target, Denmark is the closest
and Malta is the furthest to it. In fact we could identify clusters of Member States in
terms of the distances to the EU 2020 synthetic target: the North EU region is closer to
and the Mediterranean region is further away from it.
We extent the distance analysis above by adding three inequality targets -income
distribution, female employment and child poverty- and find that all of the Member
States increase their distance between their 2011 synthetic inequality-extended situation
and the 2020 inequality-extended targeted situation.
Finally, we want to analyse each Member State’s relationship between its
objective position regarding the EU 2020 synthetic target and its life satisfaction level,
inhabitants’ subjective position. Through a multivariate regression methodology, we
analyse how much of the total effect of the synthetic index on life satisfaction is direct,
and how much is mediated. The mediation analysis shows that a substantial part of the
effect of the synthetic index on life satisfaction is mediated by the GDP per capita.
These results are in line with recent views in human development and well-being research. That is, the GDP per capita is only a means to achieve socioeconomic
progress, not the end.