Sex differences in perceived barriers to active commuting to school among Spanish adolescents
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Saucedo Araújo, Romina Gisele; Campos Garzón, Pablo; López Centeno, Francisco David; Mitás, J.; Queralt, A.; Aznar, S.; Barranco Ruiz, Yaira María; Herrador Colmenero, Manuel; Chillón Garzón, PalmaEditorial
Elsevier
Materia
Active transport Psychosocial factors Environmental factors
Fecha
2026-05Referencia bibliográfica
Saucedo-Araujo, R. G., Campos-Garzón, P., López-Centeno, F. D., Mitás, J., Queralt, A., Aznar, S., Barranco-Ruiz, Y., Herrador-Colmenero, M., & Chillón, P. (2026). Sex differences in perceived barriers to active commuting to school among Spanish adolescents. Journal of Transport & Health, 48(102284), 102284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2026.102284
Patrocinador
Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness and the European Regional Development Fund - (DEP2016-75598-R, MINECO/FEDER, EU); University of Granada and Junta de Andalucía, co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund - (reference SOMM17/6107/UGR).Resumen
Objectives:
To examine sex differences in perceived barriers to active commuting to school (ACS) among Spanish adolescents and analyzed the associations between these barriers and the mode of commuting, including potential sex-specific patterns.
Methods:
In this cross-sectional study, 707 adolescents (53.6% girls; mean age = 14.05 ± 1.18 years) self-reported their mode of commuting and perceived barriers to ACS. Sex differences in perceived barriers (continuous scores from 0 to 1) were examined using linear mixed-effects models. Associations between perceived barriers and mode of commuting (active vs. passive) were analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression models, fitted with and without sex × barrier interaction terms. All models were adjusted for age and home–school distance, with school included as a random intercept.
Results:
Overall, no significant associations were observed between sex and perceived barriers, except that girls reported carrying a heavy school backpack as a greater barrier than boys (p = 0.006). In models without interaction terms, several perceived environmental, safety, and logistical barriers were associated with lower odds of ACS. Sex × barrier interaction analyses indicated modest sex-specific differences, with poor lighting, crime-related concerns, and hilly routes being more strongly associated with lower odds of ACS among girls.
Conclusion:
Perceived barriers to ACS were largely shared between boys and girls, underscoring the importance of addressing universal environmental and structural constraints related to distance, convenience, traffic, and weather. However, barriers linked to physical effort and safety appear to be particularly relevant for girls’ ACS. These findings suggest that while population-wide strategies are needed to reduce common barriers to ACS, targeted actions addressing physical effort and perceived safety may be especially important to promote ACS among girls.





