Deciphering the complex interplay between pancreatic cancer, diabetes mellitus subtypes and obesity/BMI through causal inference and mediation analyses
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Molina Montes, María Ester; Coscia, C; Gomez-Rubio, P; Fernández, A; Boenink, R; Rava, M; Márquez, M; Molero, X; Löhr, M; Sharp, L; Michalski, CW; Farré, A; Perea, J; O´Rorke, M; Greenhalf, W; Iglesias, M; Tardón, A; Gress, TM; Barberá, VM; Crnogorac-Jurcevic, T; Muñoz-Bellvís, L; Dominguez-Muñoz, JE; Renz, H; Balsells, J; Costello, E; Ilzarbe, L; Kleeff, J; Kong, B; Mora, J; O´Driscoll, D; Poves, I; Scarpa, A; Yu, J; Hidalgo, M; Lawlor, R; Ye, W; Carrato, A; Real, FX; Malats, NEditorial
BMJ
Fecha
2020-05-14Referencia bibliográfica
Gut. 2021;70(2):319-329
Resumen
Objectives To characterise the association between
type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) subtypes (new-onset
T2DM (NODM) or long-standing
T2DM (LSDM)) and
pancreatic cancer (PC) risk, to explore the direction
of causation through Mendelian randomisation (MR)
analysis and to assess the mediation role of body mass
index (BMI).
Design Information about T2DM and related factors
was collected from 2018 PC cases and 1540 controls
from the PanGenEU (European Study into Digestive
Illnesses and Genetics) study. A subset of PC cases and
controls had glycated haemoglobin, C-peptide
and
genotype data. Multivariate logistic regression models
were applied to derive ORs and 95% CIs. T2DM and
PC-related
single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) were
used as instrumental variables (IVs) in bidirectional MR
analysis to test for two-way
causal associations between
PC, NODM and LSDM. Indirect and direct effects of the
BMI-T2DM-
PC
association were further explored using
mediation analysis.
Results T2DM was associated with an increased PC
risk when compared with non-T2DM
(OR=2.50; 95% CI :
2.05 to 3.05), the risk being greater for NODM (OR=6.39;
95% CI : 4.18 to 9.78) and insulin users (OR=3.69;
95% CI : 2.80 to 4.86). The causal association between
T2DM (57-SN
P IV) and PC was not statistically significant
(ORLSDM=1.08, 95% CI : 0.86 to 1.29, ORNODM=1.06, 95% CI:
0.95 to 1.17). In contrast, there was a causal association
between PC (40-SN
P IV) and NODM (OR=2.85; 95% CI :
2.04 to 3.98), although genetic pleiotropy was present
(MR-E
gger: p value=0.03). Potential mediating effects of
BMI (125-SN
Ps as IV), particularly in terms of weight loss,
were evidenced on the NODM-PC
association (indirect
effect for BMI in previous years=0.55).
Conclusion Findings of this study do not support a
causal effect of LSDM on PC, but suggest that PC causes
NODM. The interplay between obesity, PC and T2DM is
complex.





