Continuous regeneration of the draw solution in textile wastewater treatment using a combination of simultaneous forward osmosis and reverse osmosis
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor
Sánchez Arévalo, Carmen M.; García Suarez, Laura; Camilleri Rumbau, Maria Salud; Vogel, Jörg; Álvarez Blanco, Silvia; Vincent Vela, M. Cinta; Cuartas Uribe, BeatrizEditorial
Elsevier
Materia
Forward osmosis Draw solution regeneration Textile wastewater
Date
2026-03Referencia bibliográfica
Carmen M. Sánchez-Arévalo, Laura García-Suarez, Maria Salud Camilleri-Rumbau, Jörg Vogel, Silvia Álvarez-Blanco, M. Cinta Vincent-Vela, Beatriz Cuartas-Uribe, Continuous regeneration of the draw solution in textile wastewater treatment using a combination of simultaneous forward osmosis and reverse osmosis, Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification, Volume 221, 2026, 110689, ISSN 0255-2701, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2025.110689.
Sponsorship
MCIN/ AEI / 10.13039/501100011033 / FEDER, UE - (PID2022-138299OB-I00); MCIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and ESF+ - (JDC2023-052792-I); CRUE-Universitat Politècnica de València - (Open access charge)Abstract
The concerning and abundant textile wastewater can be treated by forward osmosis (FO) in order to reduce its volume and simultaneously recover clean water. However, the productivity of FO depends on the concentration of the draw solution that is used. In this work, a simultaneous application of FO and reverse osmosis (RO) is proposed. The HFFO14® FO membrane (Aquaporin, Denmark) was employed to concentrate a real textile wastewater, whereas the SW30-2540 (DuPont, USA) RO membrane was employed to simultaneously regenerate the draw solution, which consisted in a 0.7 M NaCl solution, and to obtain a clean water stream. The concentration of the textile wastewater increased until 90% water recovery was achieved. The rejection values obtained for the chemical oxygen demand and total organic carbon were in the range 99 – 100%. Afterwards, the previously concentrated textile wastewater was again processed until a volume concentration factor of 16.5 was reached. Stable values of permeate flux (around 4 L/h·m2) were obtained in the FO process, whereas the reverse osmosis step permitted the maintenance of a stable conductivity in the draw solution and provided clean water as permeate.





