Pre-university students’ perception on algorithmic biases of artificial intelligence
Metadatos
Afficher la notice complèteAuteur
Gutiérrez Santiuste, Elba; López-Pérez, Lourdes; Poza Vilches, María De Fátima; Molina Cabrera, Daniel; Montes Soldado, Rosana; Alcalá, LuisEditorial
International Forum of Educational Technology and Society
Materia
Algorithmic biases Artificial intelligence Pre-university students
Date
2025-07Referencia bibliográfica
Published version: Gutiérrez-Santiuste, E., López-Pérez, L., Poza-Vilches, F., Molina-Cabrera, D., Montes-Soldado, R., & Alcalá, L. (2025). Pre-university students’ perception on algorithmic biases of artificial intelligence. Educational. Technology & Society, 28(3), 369–382. doi:10.30191/ETS.202507_28(3).RP03
Patrocinador
Education Service of the Consorcio Parque de las Ciencias and Grian A; Regional Ministry of University, Research, and Innovation of the Government of Andalusia, QUAL21-14Résumé
This research focuses on pre-university students’ perceptions of algorithmic biases in artificial
intelligence. Six types of biases (generational, gender, functional diversity, ethnicity, geographical origin and
economic reasons) are examined on the basis of four variables (age, sex, educational level and academic year) of
young people. A quantitative method is employed using a questionnaire. ANOVA, T-test and Kruskall-Wallis
test are used. The results show statistically significant differences in the variables analysed and, in general terms,
young people have a medium-high perception of possible biases. The highest number of differences between
groups was found in the level of education (secondary education/baccalaureate/vocational training). The least
differences were found in age (less than 12 years/12–14 years/15–17 years/18–21 years) and sex of the
participants (male/female). Students in vocational training have a higher perception of bias and those in
baccalaureate have the lowest means. In this case, significant differences were found. The results also show
significant differences in biases produced by functional diversity, geographical origin and economic reasons. In
relation to age, significant differences were found in two groups of students. According to sex, males have a
higher perception of gender and ethnicity biases. These results have consequences for educational practice, as
they highlight the aspects that should be addressed in the training of young people in artificial intelligence. It also
has implications for research as it opens up new questions to be analysed.





