| dc.contributor.author | Rasoulzadeh, Ali | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kohan, Mohammad Reza | |
| dc.contributor.author | Amirzadeh, Arash | |
| dc.contributor.author | Heydari, Mahsa | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mobaser, Javanshir Azizi | |
| dc.contributor.author | Raoof, Majid | |
| dc.contributor.author | Moghadam, Javad Ramezani | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fernández-Gálvez, Jesús | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-21T10:40:40Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-21T10:40:40Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-10-21 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Rasoulzadeh, A.; Kohan, M.R.; Amirzadeh, A.; Heydari, M.; Mobaser, J.A.; Raoof, M.; Moghadam, J.R.; Fernández-Gálvez, J. Improving Soil Water Simulation in Semi-Arid Agriculture: A Comparative Evaluation of Water Retention Curves and Inverse Modeling Using HYDRUS-1D. Hydrology 2025, 12, 273. | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10481/107239 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Water scarcity in semi-arid regions necessitates accurate soil water modeling to opti-
mize irrigation management. This study compares three HYDRUS-1D parameterization
approaches—based on the drying-branch soil water retention curve (SWRC), wetting-
branch SWRC (using Shani’s drip method), and inverse modeling—to simulating soil water
content at 15 cm and 45 cm depths under center-pivot irrigation in a semi-arid region.
Field experiments in three maize fields provided daily soil water, soil hydraulic, and me-
teorological data. Inverse modeling achieved the highest accuracy (NRMSE: 2.29–7.40%;
RMSE: 0.006–0.023 cm3 cm−3), particularly at 15 cm depth, by calibrating van Genuchten
parameters against observed water content. The wetting-branch approach outperformed
the drying branch at the same depth, capturing irrigation-induced wetting processes more
effectively. Statistical validation confirmed the robustness of inverse modeling in repro-
ducing temporal patterns, while wetting-branch data improved deep-layer accuracy. The
results demonstrate that inverse modeling is a reliable approach for soil water simulation
and irrigation management, whereas the wetting-branch parameterization offers a practical,
field-adaptable alternative. This study provides one of the first side-by-side evaluations of
these three modeling approaches under real-world semi-arid conditions. | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | MDPI | es_ES |
| dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject | soil hydraulic parameters | es_ES |
| dc.subject | wetting and drying branches | es_ES |
| dc.subject | dripper method | es_ES |
| dc.subject | field calibration | es_ES |
| dc.subject | root zone modeling | es_ES |
| dc.title | Improving Soil Water Simulation in Semi-Arid Agriculture: A Comparative Evaluation of Water Retention Curves and Inverse Modeling Using HYDRUS-1D | es_ES |
| dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
| dc.rights.accessRights | open access | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3390/ hydrology12100273 | |
| dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | es_ES |