Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRasoulzadeh, Ali
dc.contributor.authorKohan, Mohammad Reza
dc.contributor.authorAmirzadeh, Arash
dc.contributor.authorHeydari, Mahsa
dc.contributor.authorMobaser, Javanshir Azizi
dc.contributor.authorRaoof, Majid
dc.contributor.authorMoghadam, Javad Ramezani
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Gálvez, Jesús
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-21T10:40:40Z
dc.date.available2025-10-21T10:40:40Z
dc.date.issued2025-10-21
dc.identifier.citationRasoulzadeh, A.; Kohan, M.R.; Amirzadeh, A.; Heydari, M.; Mobaser, J.A.; Raoof, M.; Moghadam, J.R.; Fernández-Gálvez, J. Improving Soil Water Simulation in Semi-Arid Agriculture: A Comparative Evaluation of Water Retention Curves and Inverse Modeling Using HYDRUS-1D. Hydrology 2025, 12, 273.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/107239
dc.description.abstractWater scarcity in semi-arid regions necessitates accurate soil water modeling to opti- mize irrigation management. This study compares three HYDRUS-1D parameterization approaches—based on the drying-branch soil water retention curve (SWRC), wetting- branch SWRC (using Shani’s drip method), and inverse modeling—to simulating soil water content at 15 cm and 45 cm depths under center-pivot irrigation in a semi-arid region. Field experiments in three maize fields provided daily soil water, soil hydraulic, and me- teorological data. Inverse modeling achieved the highest accuracy (NRMSE: 2.29–7.40%; RMSE: 0.006–0.023 cm3 cm−3), particularly at 15 cm depth, by calibrating van Genuchten parameters against observed water content. The wetting-branch approach outperformed the drying branch at the same depth, capturing irrigation-induced wetting processes more effectively. Statistical validation confirmed the robustness of inverse modeling in repro- ducing temporal patterns, while wetting-branch data improved deep-layer accuracy. The results demonstrate that inverse modeling is a reliable approach for soil water simulation and irrigation management, whereas the wetting-branch parameterization offers a practical, field-adaptable alternative. This study provides one of the first side-by-side evaluations of these three modeling approaches under real-world semi-arid conditions.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectsoil hydraulic parameterses_ES
dc.subjectwetting and drying brancheses_ES
dc.subjectdripper methodes_ES
dc.subjectfield calibrationes_ES
dc.subjectroot zone modelinges_ES
dc.titleImproving Soil Water Simulation in Semi-Arid Agriculture: A Comparative Evaluation of Water Retention Curves and Inverse Modeling Using HYDRUS-1Des_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ hydrology12100273
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional