Improving Soil Water Simulation in Semi-Arid Agriculture: A Comparative Evaluation of Water Retention Curves and Inverse Modeling Using HYDRUS-1D
Identificadores
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10481/107239Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor
Rasoulzadeh, Ali; Kohan, Mohammad Reza; Amirzadeh, Arash; Heydari, Mahsa; Mobaser, Javanshir Azizi; Raoof, Majid; Moghadam, Javad Ramezani; Fernández-Gálvez, JesúsEditorial
MDPI
Materia
soil hydraulic parameters wetting and drying branches dripper method field calibration root zone modeling 
Date
2025-10-21Referencia bibliográfica
Rasoulzadeh, A.; Kohan, M.R.; Amirzadeh, A.; Heydari, M.; Mobaser, J.A.; Raoof, M.; Moghadam, J.R.; Fernández-Gálvez, J. Improving Soil Water Simulation in Semi-Arid Agriculture: A Comparative Evaluation of Water Retention Curves and Inverse Modeling Using HYDRUS-1D. Hydrology 2025, 12, 273.
Abstract
Water scarcity in semi-arid regions necessitates accurate soil water modeling to opti-
mize irrigation management. This study compares three HYDRUS-1D parameterization
approaches—based on the drying-branch soil water retention curve (SWRC), wetting-
branch SWRC (using Shani’s drip method), and inverse modeling—to simulating soil water
content at 15 cm and 45 cm depths under center-pivot irrigation in a semi-arid region.
Field experiments in three maize fields provided daily soil water, soil hydraulic, and me-
teorological data. Inverse modeling achieved the highest accuracy (NRMSE: 2.29–7.40%;
RMSE: 0.006–0.023 cm3 cm−3), particularly at 15 cm depth, by calibrating van Genuchten
parameters against observed water content. The wetting-branch approach outperformed
the drying branch at the same depth, capturing irrigation-induced wetting processes more
effectively. Statistical validation confirmed the robustness of inverse modeling in repro-
ducing temporal patterns, while wetting-branch data improved deep-layer accuracy. The
results demonstrate that inverse modeling is a reliable approach for soil water simulation
and irrigation management, whereas the wetting-branch parameterization offers a practical,
field-adaptable alternative. This study provides one of the first side-by-side evaluations of
these three modeling approaches under real-world semi-arid conditions.





