Unaccompanied Foreign Minors and Education: A Bibliometric Analysis of the International Academic Literature
Identificadores
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10481/104943Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemFecha
2025Referencia bibliográfica
Serrano-García, J., Rakdani-Arif Billah, F. Z., Expósito-López, J., & Olmedo-Moreno, E. M. (2025). Unaccompanied foreign minors and education: A bibliometric analysis of the international academic literature. Frontiers.
Patrocinador
This research was carried out as part of a project funded by the Board of Universities, Research, and Innovation under the authority of the Local Government of Andalusia. The project, titled ‘Interactive Communities and Hybrid Learning Environments to Facilitate Counselling and Tutorial Action for Vulnerable Young People in ARSSCIDA Areas in Andalusia’ (P21_00104), received financial support. Additionally, funding was provided for the training of university educators through the FPU programme (reference number FPU22/00811). This grant was awarded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and, where applicable, supported by “FSE Invest in Your Future” or “NextGenerationEU/PRTR of the European Union.”Resumen
The migration of unaccompanied foreign minors presents a significant global educational and social challenge. This study aims to analyse the international scientific production on UFM in the educational field, identifying key trends, influential authors, and institutional contributions. Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted using data from the Web of Science and Scopus databases, applying rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure the relevance of selected studies.The findings reveal that research on UFM in education is limited, with publications concentrated in a few high-impact journals and led by a small group of prolific authors. The results align with Bradford's and Lotka's laws, demonstrating an uneven distribution of research outputs and the dominance of a few institutions, particularly the University of Granada. Thematic analysis highlights a focus on academic self-efficacy, employability skills, social inclusion, and digital competencies. Conclusion: However, gaps remain in understanding teachers' perceptions of UFM and the impact of educational policies on their integration. Addressing these gaps is essential to fostering inclusive education and informing policy development. Future research should prioritise teacher training programmes to challenge stereotypes and implement strategies that enhance digital inclusion and social integration for this vulnerable population.