Impact of Small-Sided Games and Hoff Circuit Training on Aerobic Capacity

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the effects of small-sided games (4 vs. 4) versus training in the Hoof technical circuit on improving aerobic capacity in soccer players. The study included 16 soccer players with similar characteristics (average age: 24.7 ± 3.28 years, average weight: 76.4 ± 4.2 kg, average height: 180.6 ± 3.2 cm), divided into two distinct training methods: small-sided games (4 vs. 4) and circuit training using the Hoof technical circuit. The results, analyzed statistically using SPSS, indicated no statistically significant differences between the two integrated training methods—small-sided games (4 vs. 4) and the Hoof technical circuit—in enhancing aerobic capacities such as maximal aerobic speed (VMA) and maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max). Both methods contributed to improving aerobic capacity at comparable levels, with a slight advantage observed in the post-test compared to the pre-test for both groups.