Dietary and lifestyle determinants of vitamin D status in the UK Biobank Cohort study for predictive modeling
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Alcalá-Santiago, Ángela; García Villanova Ruiz, Belén; Ruiz López, María Dolores; Gil Hernández, Ángel; Rodríguez Barranco, Miguel; Sánchez, María José; Molina-Montes, EstherEditorial
Elsevier
Materia
Vitamin D status Vitamin D deficiency Diet Lifestyle Cohort Predictive model
Fecha
2025-04-10Referencia bibliográfica
Á. Alcalá-Santiago, B. García-Villanova, M.D. Ruíz-López et al. / Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 142 (2025) 109919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2025.109919
Patrocinador
Junta de Andalucía PECOVID-0200-2020; European Regional Development Fund (ERDF-FEDER); Government of Spain (FPU22/02915); Universidad de Granada / CBUAResumen
Vitamin D (VD) is involved in a wide variety of physiological processes. The high prevalence of VD deficiency in the population requires stronger preven- tive measures. The aim was to characterize the dietary and lifestyle determinants of VD levels in blood and of VD deficiency to further develop predictive models of these two outcomes. A total of 63,759 participants from the UK Biobank study with available data on dietary intake of VD, assessed via 24-hour recalls, and with measurements of serum 25(OH)D levels were included. Linear and logistic regression models were applied to identify factors associated with VD levels and VD deficiency outcomes, and to evaluate the influence of covariates on the association between VD in serum and VD in the diet. Predictive models for both VD outcomes were constructed using classical regression models and machine learning methods based on penalized likelihood methods. Approximately 10% of the participants had VD deficiency (VD < 25 nmol/L), and 38.9% were at risk of VD inadequacy (VD 25–49 nmol/L). The dietary intake of VD was significantly lower in the VD deficient group. This latter group showed lower engagement in physical activity (22.1%) compared to the non-deficient group (13.4%; P < .001). Also, overweight and obesity (vs normal weight) were related to a greater likelihood of VD deficiency (OR = 1.18 and 1.96, respectively). A similar odds of VD deficiency was observed for abdominal obesity (OR = 1.83). A weaker association was observed between dietary VD intake, based on participant reports, and VD levels. With regard to sunlight exposure, darker skin tones (OR dark vs fair skin = 3.11), season (OR winter vs autumn = 3.76) and less outdoor time activities (OR per 1 h increase = 0.96) were also related to VD deficiency. Predictive models for both classical regression and machine learning, showed good accuracy (AUC = 0.8–0.9 for VD deficiency). In conclusion, while a rich diet in VD boosts its levels, sun exposure plays a more significant role particularly in populations from the UK or Northern Europe. A predictive model including key determinants could effectively assess VD deficiency.