<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:digibug.ugr.es:10481/51153">
      <dc:title>Google Scholar’s citation graph: comprehensive, global… and inaccessible</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Martín Martín, Alberto</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Delgado López-Cózar, Emilio</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>Google Scholar</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Citation graph</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Open Citations</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Highly-cited documents</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Web of Science</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Scopus</dc:subject>
      <dc:description>Google Scholar contains a vast wealth of citation data, but this data is not easily accessible. This slides present some of the main strengths and weaknesses of Google Scholar citation data, as compared to the citation databases that are most frequently used for bibliometric analyses (Web of Science and Scopus). It also describes our own workflow to extract and work with Google Scholar data.</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2018-05-28T08:49:36Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2018-05-28T08:49:36Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2018-05-23</dc:date>
      <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10481/51153</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
      <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/es/</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 España</dc:rights>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>