Study of the Applicability of Thermochemical Processes for Solid Recovered Fuel
Metadatos
Afficher la notice complèteAuteur
De la Torre Bayo, Juan Jesús; Zamorano Toro, Montserrat; Torres Rojo, Juan Carlos; Gil-Lalaguna, Noemí; Gea, Gloria; Fonts Amador, Isabel; Martín-Pascual, JaimeEditorial
MDPI
Materia
screening waste wastewater treatment plants solid recovered fuel
Date
2024-11-20Referencia bibliográfica
de la Torre Bayo, J.J. et. al. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 10765. [https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210765]
Patrocinador
EMASAGRA S.A. (research project No. 4325 Valorización energética de residuos de desbaste como combustible sólido recuperado para lograr el residuo cero en EDAR); Project PID2022-137016OB-I00 financed by Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades and Agencia Estatal de Investigación (MICIU/AEI)/10.13039/501100011033, Spain and by FEDER, UE; Aragón Government has also given frame support (Research Group Ref. T22_23R); Post-doctoral fellowship (RYC2020-030593-I) financed by MICIU/ AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by El FSE invierte en tu futuroRésumé
Within the context of the new circular model for wastewater treatment aimed at achieving
zero waste, this research seeks an alternative to landfill disposal of waste screenings. It examines
the feasibility of thermochemical processes—combustion and gasification—for the valorisation of
solid recovered fuel (SRF) derived from screening wastes, which are the only waste in wastewater
treatment plants (WWTPs) that typically have an absence of existing recycling or valorisation
processes. Laboratory-scale experiments assessed the technical viability of gasification, and energy
balances were calculated for both combustion and the syngas obtained from gasification experiments.
Results indicate that both processes are feasible for SRF valorisation. Combustion demonstrated
the highest energy efficiency, yielding up to 1.6 MJ per kg of raw SRF, compared to gasification’s
maximum of 1.4 MJ. The moisture content in SRF feedstock influences both processes, underscoring
the need to optimise moisture levels. Additionally, combustion showed a higher conversion efficiency
due to the complete oxidation of the feedstock, whereas gasification produced valuable syngas that
can be further utilised for energy production or as a chemical feedstock. The study concludes that,
from a purely energetic perspective, combustion is the most efficient process for SRF valorisation.
However, gasification offers significant environmental and sustainability advantages, including lower
greenhouse gas emissions and the potential for integrating with renewable energy systems, making it
a more attractive option for long-term sustainability goals.