Exploring expert perceptions towards emerging pollutants and their impacts in reused wastewater and agriculture
Metadatos
Afficher la notice complèteAuteur
Jódar Abellán, Antonio; Albaladejo-García, José Antonio; Aznar-Crespo, Pablo; Ballesta de los Santos, Manuel; Haji Seyed Asadollah, Seyed Babak; Derdour, Abdessamed; Martínez-Nicolás, Juan José; Melgarejo, Pablo; Prats, Daniel; Serrano Bernardo, Francisco AntonioEditorial
Elsevier
Materia
Expert surveys Water pollution Crop irrigation
Date
2024-10-08Referencia bibliográfica
Jodar Abellan, A. et. al. Agricultural Water Management 304 (2024) 109098. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109098]
Patrocinador
Projects: LIFE15 ENV/ES/000598, SOS-AGUA-XXI/MIG-20211026 and AGROALNEXT2022/NAC/00086; Margarita Salas postdoc Spanish program and from the project AGROALNEXT2022/NAC/00086; University of Alicante- Diputación de Alicante, (Spain)Résumé
Water sustainability involves several natural and human spheres conditioning the availability and quality of
water resources and life conservation. Regarding water quality, currently emerging pollutants (EPs) are a key
topic at global scale since they are difficult to remove by traditional water treatment systems. In this context, this
work aims to evaluate experts’ perception of several EPs issues with a special focus on semi-arid Mediterranean
areas where EPs are negatively impacting water, environmental, and agricultural systems as, in these areas,
effluents from water treatment plants are widely reused in the irrigation of crops, urban gardens, and golf courses
or directly discharged on natural streams. Particularly, a detailed survey composed of questions about EPs
regulation, risk insight, equipment, social and economic impacts, was performed collecting 437 responses. Main
results suggested that EPs existence may pose a significant risk and a destabilizing factor in wastewater reuse,
with negative impacts to crop irrigation, being managers the class with more concern followed by scientifics and
administratives. New EPs regulations raises uncertainty amongst experts since 29 % considered positive its
creation, while 20 % estimated this fact as regular and 14 % as negative. As well, although the combination of
technologies to improve EPs removal generated agreement, aspects like the treatment charges at water treatment
plants or the price/bill of EPs-free water were features of ambiguity. Within EPs elimination, the three expert
groups highlighted that technologies impacts in the sustainability spheres will be positive on public health (87 %
of responses), social trust (75 %), and environmental sustainability (76 %). Likewise, 88 % of experts concurred
that the future of wastewater reuse relies on a combination of technologies. These findings offer valuable information
to water legislators and policymakers to manage water resources, especially in semi-arid areas due to
the final use of treated effluents and, therefore, the great implications for agriculture, environment and human
health.