Economic evaluation of pharmacogenomic‑guided antiplatelet treatment in Spanish patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome participating in the U‑PGx PREPARE study
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor
Koufaki, Margarita‑Ioanna; Fragoulakis, Vasileios; Díaz Villamarín, Xando; Karamperis, Kariofyllis; Vozikis, Athanassios; J. Swen, Jesse; Dávila Fajardo, Cristina Lucía; Z. Vasileiou, Konstantinos; P. Patrinos, George; Mitropoulou, ChristinaEditorial
SpringerLink
Materia
Clopidogrel Economic evaluation Cost-effectiveness
Date
2023-06-07Referencia bibliográfica
Koufaki, M.I. et. al. Hum Genomics 17, 51 (2023). [https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-023-00495-3]
Sponsorship
European Commission Horizon 2020 Program via Grant Agreement 668353Abstract
Background Cardiovascular diseases and especially Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) constitute a major health issue
impacting millions of patients worldwide. Being a leading cause of death and hospital admissions in many European
countries including Spain, it accounts for enormous amounts of healthcare expenditures for its management. Clopidogrel
is one of the oldest antiplatelet medications used as standard of care in ACS.
Methods In this study, we performed an economic evaluation study to estimate whether a genome-guided clopidogrel
treatment is cost-effective compared to conventional one in a large cohort of 243 individuals of Spanish origin
suffering from ACS and treated with clopidogrel. Data were derived from the U-PGx PREPARE clinical trial. Effectiveness
was measured as survival of individuals while study data on safety and efficacy, as well as on resource utilization
associated with each adverse drug reaction were used to measure costs to treat these adverse drug reactions. A
generalized linear regression model was used to estimate cost differences for both study groups.
Results Based on our findings, PGx-guided treatment group is cost-effective. PGx-guided treatment demonstrated
to have 50% less hospital admissions, reduced emergency visits and almost 13% less ADRs compared to the non-
PGx approach with mean QALY 1.07 (95% CI, 1.04–1.10) versus 1.06 (95% CI, 1.03–1.09) for the control group, while
life years for both groups were 1.24 (95% CI, 1.20–1.26) and 1.23 (95% CI, 1.19–1.26), respectively. The mean total cost
of PGx-guided treatment was 50% less expensive than conventional therapy with clopidogrel [€883 (95% UI, €316–
€1582), compared to €1,755 (95% UI, €765–€2949)].
Conclusion These findings suggest that PGx-guided clopidogrel treatment represents a cost-effective option for
patients suffering from ACS in the Spanish healthcare setting.





