Intolerance of uncertainty does not significantly predict decisions about delayed, probabilistic rewards: A failure to replicate Luhmann, C. C., Ishida, K., & Hajcak, G. (2011)
Metadatos
Afficher la notice complèteAuteur
Cobos, Pedro L; Quintero, Maria J; López, Francisco J.; Luque, David; Ciria, Luis Fermín; Morís Fernández, JoaquínEditorial
Public Library of Science
Date
2024-07-11Referencia bibliográfica
Cobos PL, Quintero MJ, Lo´pez FJ, Luque D, Ciria LF, Morı´s yJ (2024) Intolerance of uncertainty does not significantly predict decisions about delayed, probabilistic rewards: A failure to replicate Luhmann, C. C., Ishida, K., & Hajcak, G. (2011). PLoS ONE 19(7): e0298503. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298503
Patrocinador
Grants PID2021-126767NB-I00 and PGC2018-096863-BI00 from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities (AEI/FEDER, UE); Grants UMA18-FEDERJA-051 and ProyExcel_00287 (Junta de Andalucía regional government); Predoctoral grant from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities (FPU Programme, FPU18/00917)Résumé
Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) is thought to lead to maladaptive behaviours and dysfunctional
decision making, both in the clinical and healthy population. The seminal study
reported by Luhmann and collaborators in 2011 showed that IU was negatively associated
with choosing a delayed, but more certain and valuable, reward over choosing an immediate,
but less certain and valuable, reward. These findings have been widely disseminated
across the field of personality and individual differences because of their relevance to understand
the role of IU in maladaptive behaviours in anxiety-related disorders. We conducted a
study to replicate and extend Luhmann et al.’s results with a sample of 313 participants,
which exceeded the size necessary (N = 266) to largely improve the statistical power of the
original study by using the small telescopes approach. The results of our well powered study
strongly suggest that the relationship between IU and the tendency to prefer an immediate,
but less certain and less valuable reward is virtually negligible. Consequently, although this
relationship cannot be definitely discarded, we conclude that it cannot be detected with Luhmann
et al.’s (2011) decision-making task.