Association between Mid-Term Functionality and Clinical Severity in Patients Hospitalized for Pulmonary Embolism
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor
Gámiz-Molina, Ana Belén; Valenza Peña, Geraldine; Raya Benítez, Julia; Heredia-Ciuró, Alejandro; Granados Santiago, María; López López, Laura; Valenza, Marie CarmenEditorial
MDPI
Materia
pulmonary embolism clinical severity quality of life
Date
2024-07-02Referencia bibliográfica
Gámiz Molina, A.B. et. al. Healthcare 2024, 12, 1323. [https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12131323]
Sponsorship
research project at the University of Granada (PPJIA2023-041)Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between clinical severity and functionality,
occupational performance, and health-related quality of life in patients hospitalized with
pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary embolism patients were grouped by clinical severity using the Pulmonary
Embolism Severity Index. Those scoring ≥160 were in the high-severity group (HSG); those
scoring < 160 in the low–moderate group (LMSG). The main variables were functionality assessed
by theWorld Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS), self-perception of
occupational performance assessed by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM),
pain and fatigue assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and health-related quality of life assessed
by the EuroQol-5Dimensions (EQ-5D). Patients were evaluated at hospital admission and at
1-month and 3-month follow-up. At admission, there were significant differences between groups in
the WHODAS and health-related quality of life in favor of the LMSG. At 1-month and at 3-month
follow-up, there were significant differences between the LMSG and HSG in WHODAS, COMP,
NRS pain, fatigue and EQ-5D scores in favor of the LMSG. An association exists between clinical
severity and mid-term functionality, self-perception of occupational performance, pain, fatigue, and
health-related quality of life in PE patients.