Diet quality index as a predictor of treatment efficacy in overweight and obese adolescents: The EVASYON study
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor
De Miguel-Etayo, Pilar; Moreno, Luis A; Santabárbara, Javier; Martín Matillas, Miguel; Azcona-San Julián, María Cristina; Marti-Del-Moral, Amelia; Campoy Folgoso, Cristina; Marcos, Ascensión; Garagorri, JesusEditorial
Churchill Livingstone in Clinical Nutrition
Materia
Adolescents Diet quality index Dietary compliance Fat mass loss Multi-intervention approach
Date
2019-04Referencia bibliográfica
De Miguel-Etayo P, Moreno LA, Santabárbara J, Martín-Matillas M, Azcona-San Julian MC, Marti Del Moral A, Campoy C, Marcos A, Garagorri JM; EVASYON Study Group. Diet quality index as a predictor of treatment efficacy in overweight and obese adolescents: The EVASYON study. Clin Nutr. 2019 Apr;38(2):782-790. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.02.032. Epub 2018 Mar 29. PMID: 29730135.
Sponsorship
The study was supported by the Ministry of Health, Social Services and Equality via the Carlos III Institute of Health (FIS Grant PI051080, PI051579). The EVASYON study received the award for the best applied research project in 2009 from AESAN (Spanish Agency for Food Safety and Nutrition from the Spanish Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs. The study was supported by Aragon's Regional Government (DGA, Diputacion General de Arag on ) and European Regional Development Fund.Abstract
Background and Aim
A diet quality index (DQI) is a tool that provides an overall score of an individual´s dietary intake when assessing compliance with food-based dietary guidelines. A number of DQIs have emerged, albeit their associations with health-related outcomes are debated. The aim of the present study was to assess whether adherence to dietary intervention, and the overall quality of the diet, can predict body composition changes.
Methods
To this purpose, overweight/obese adolescents (n=117, aged: 13 to 16 years; 51 males, 66 females) were recruited into a multi-component (diet, physical activity and psychological support) family-based group treatment programme. We measured the adolescents’ compliance and body composition at baseline and after 2 months (intensive phase) and 13 months (extensive phase) of follow-up. Also, at baseline, after 6 months, and at the end of follow-up we calculated the DQI.
Results
Global compliance with the dietary intervention was 37.4% during the intensive phase, and 14.3% during the extensive phase. Physical activity compliance was 94.1% at 2-months and 34.7% at 13months and psychological support compliance were growing over the intervention period (10.3% intensive phase and 45.3% during extensive phase). Adolescents complying with the meal frequency criteria at the end of the extensive phase had greater reductions in FMI z-scores than those did not complying (Cohen´s d=0.53). A statistically significant association was observed with the diet quality index. DQI-A variation explained 98.1% of BMI z-score changes and 95.1% of FMI changes.
Conclusions
We conclude that assessment of changes in diet quality could be a useful tool in predicting body composition changes in obese adolescents involved in a diet and physical activity intervention programme backed-up by psychological and family support.