• français 
    • español
    • English
    • français
  • FacebookPinterestTwitter
  • español
  • English
  • français
Voir le document 
  •   Accueil de DIGIBUG
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Geografía Humana
  • DGH - Artículos
  • Voir le document
  •   Accueil de DIGIBUG
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Geografía Humana
  • DGH - Artículos
  • Voir le document
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Territorially unequal rural development: the cases of the LEADER Initiative and the PRODER Programme in Andalusia (Spain)

[PDF] Articulo principal-EMBARGADO (2.644Mo)
Identificadores
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10481/87601
DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1424118
Exportar
RISRefworksMendeleyBibtex
Estadísticas
Statistiques d'usage de visualisation
Metadatos
Afficher la notice complète
Auteur
Cañete Pérez, José Antonio; Cejudo García, Eugenio; Navarro Valverde, Francisco Antonio
Editorial
Routledge
Materia
european rural development
 
Local Action Groups
 
neo-endpgenous rural development
 
LEADER approach
 
Andalusia
 
Date
2018
Referencia bibliográfica
José Antonio Cañete, Francisco Navarro & Eugenio Cejudo (2018) Territorially unequal rural development: the cases of the LEADER Initiative and the PRODER Programme in Andalusia (Spain), European Planning Studies, 26:4, 726-744, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1424118
Patrocinador
This study was carried out as part of the research project entitled 'Development programmes and rural change in the European Union: governance, results and lessons to share 2007-13' funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness within its Excellence Programme [CSO2014-56223-P].
Résumé
This paper studies the territorial effects of the LEADER approach in Southern Europe, by analysing the region of Andalusia (Spain). Our research has revealed that, in many cases, projects were concentrated in the most dynamic, most populated areas, with a well-established business network with the financial and organizational capacity required to access European funding. In these areas, the economic leadership of the most dynamic municipalities has been reinforced at the expense of more depressed areas with little social capital and few businesses. These programmes have not, therefore, helped to mitigate territorial imbalances. In a minority of rural areas, however, this trend was not observed, which shows that although territorial inequality is a widespread problem in the practice of neo-endogenous rural development, it does not affect all areas to the same degree.
Colecciones
  • DGH - Artículos

Mon compte

Ouvrir une sessionS'inscrire

Parcourir

Tout DIGIBUGCommunautés et CollectionsPar date de publicationAuteursTitresSujetsFinanciaciónPerfil de autor UGRCette collectionPar date de publicationAuteursTitresSujetsFinanciación

Statistiques

Statistiques d'usage de visualisation

Servicios

Pasos para autoarchivoAyudaLicencias Creative CommonsSHERPA/RoMEODulcinea Biblioteca UniversitariaNos puedes encontrar a través deCondiciones legales

Contactez-nous | Faire parvenir un commentaire