Oil and gas production from the pyrolytic transformation of recycled plastic waste: An integral study by polymer families
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Calero De Hoces, Francisca Mónica; Rafael, R. Solís; Mario J., Muñoz-Batista; Pérez Muñoz, Antonio; Blázquez García, Gabriel; Martín Lara, María ÁngelesEditorial
Elsevier
Materia
Municipal solid waste Plastic waste Pyrolysis Polymer families
Fecha
2023-02-16Referencia bibliográfica
Mónica Calero, R.R. Solís, M.J. Muñoz-Batista et al. Oil and gas production from the pyrolytic transformation of recycled plastic waste: An integral study by polymer families. Chemical Engineering Science 271 (2023) 118569[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2023.118569]
Patrocinador
Project P20_00167 (FEDER/Junta de Andalucía-Consejería de Transformación Económica,Industria, Conocimiento y Universidades); Project B-RNM-78-UGR20 (FEDER/Junta de Andalucía-Consejería de Transformación Económica,Industria, Conocimiento y Universidades); Universidad de Granada / CBUA.Resumen
Different plastics recovered from a local urban solid waste plant were collected before landfilling, separated,
and classified by families, i.e. polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), high impact and expanded
polystyrene (HIPS and EPS, respectively), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and polyvinyl chloride
(PVC). A systematic pyrolysis study was carried out to compare the different behavior registered in each
plastic type, and an integral analysis of the produced oils and synthetic gas was conducted. In general
terms, the oil yield followed the order EPS > PP > PE > HIPS > PET > PVC, reaching maximum values over
500 C after 1 h of treatment. The oil from HIPS, EPS, PET, and PP was rich in light compounds, i.e., C5-C9
hydrocarbons. Almost 100 % of the oil from HIPS and EPS pyrolysis was aromatic. The aromatic fraction
was important in the case of PVC (57 %) and PET (45 %). PE produced an oil with the most varied distribution
of compounds but rich in olefins (67 %). The analysis of the non-condensable composition of the
gas showed that in all the pyrolysis gases methane was over 50 % (vol.), followed by ethane in importance.
CO was produced in the case of PET.