• English 
    • español
    • English
    • français
  • FacebookPinterestTwitter
  • español
  • English
  • français
View Item 
  •   DIGIBUG Home
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Filosofía I
  • DFI - Artículos
  • View Item
  •   DIGIBUG Home
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Filosofía I
  • DFI - Artículos
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Justifying the Precautionary Principle as a political principle

[PDF] Texto completo del artículo (223.6Kb)
Identificadores
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10481/81526
DOI: 10.3354/esep00206
Exportar
RISRefworksMendeleyBibtex
Estadísticas
View Usage Statistics
Metadata
Show full item record
Author
Bermejo Luque, Lilian; Rodríguez Alcázar, Francisco Javier
Editorial
Inter-Research
Materia
Precautionary principle
 
Proactionary principle
 
Precautionary framework
 
Political minimalism
 
Public decision-making
 
Argumentation scheme
 
Date
2023-05-11
Referencia bibliográfica
ETHICS IN SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, Vol. 23: 7–22, 2023 [https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00206]
Sponsorship
Spanish Ministry of Innovation, Science and Universities for funding their research through the project PID2019-107478GB-I00
Abstract
Our aim is to defend the Precautionary Principle (PP) against the main theoretical and practical criticisms that it has raised by proposing a novel conception and a specific formulation of the principle. We first address the theoretical concerns against the idea of there being a principle of precaution by arguing for a distinctively political conception of the PP as opposed to a moral one. Our claim is that the rationale of the PP is grounded in the fact that contemporary societies wish to avoid morally unacceptable risks while at the same time pursuing other goals, aspirations and values. Following this political conception of the PP, we propose a specific formulation in terms of an argumentation scheme — the Argumentation Scheme for Appealing to Precaution — which is meant to solve, in turn, the main practical concerns that the PP has raised. We explain the advantages of our proposal by analysing appeals to precaution in the cases of (1) the European restrictions on the free movement of persons during the COVID-19 pandemic and (2) the discharge of nuclear wastes into the Irish Sea.
Collections
  • DFI - Artículos

My Account

LoginRegister

Browse

All of DIGIBUGCommunities and CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectFinanciaciónAuthor profilesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectFinanciación

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Servicios

Pasos para autoarchivoAyudaLicencias Creative CommonsSHERPA/RoMEODulcinea Biblioteca UniversitariaNos puedes encontrar a través deCondiciones legales

Contact Us | Send Feedback