• English 
    • español
    • English
    • français
  • FacebookPinterestTwitter
  • español
  • English
  • français
View Item 
  •   DIGIBUG Home
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Medicina
  • DMed - Artículos
  • View Item
  •   DIGIBUG Home
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Medicina
  • DMed - Artículos
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Variability in the prevalence of premenstrual asthma

[PDF] ARTÍCULO (370.3Kb)
Identificadores
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10481/81134
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00045109
Exportar
RISRefworksMendeleyBibtex
Estadísticas
View Usage Statistics
Metadata
Show full item record
Author
Pereira Vega, A.; Romero Palacios, Pedro José
Materia
Menstrual cycle
 
Premenstrual asthma
 
Prevalence
 
Date
2010-10-10
Referencia bibliográfica
A. Pereira Vega, J. L. Sánchez Ramos, J. A. Maldonado Pérez, F. J. Álvarez Gutierrez, J. M. Ignacio García, R. Vázquez Oliva, P. Romero Palacios, J. M. Bravo Nieto, I. Sánchez Rodríguez, F. Gil Muñoz European Respiratory Journal 2010 35: 980-986; [DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00045109]
Sponsorship
Asociación de neumólogos del sur (Neumosur) in 2003; Health Ministry of the Regional Autonomous Government of Andalusia in 2005 (both Seville, Spain)
Abstract
Our aim is to analyse the differences in the prevalence of premenstrual asthma (PMA) according to a set of criteria, the relationship between them and the influence of asthma severity. The answer ‘‘Yes’’ to ‘‘Does your asthma get worse before menstruation?’’ was considered subjective PMA. A daily respiratory symptoms register of fertile asthmatic females was taken during two consecutive menstrual cycles. For the semi-objective diagnosis, an exacerbation of o20% was required in the symptoms register. Objective diagnosis was a premenstrual worsening of o20% of peak flow. We selected 103 patients. Subjective premenstrual deterioration was perceived in 43.7%. The semi-objective deterioration of symptoms in the first cycle occurred in 44.7%, and in 22.3% in both cycles. A total of 54.3% of females with semi-objective criteria in the first cycle perceived a subjective deterioration of symptoms, versus 35.1% of those without semi-objective criteria (p50.05). PMA was present at all levels of asthma severity, with no clear link to the degree of severity. The detection of PMA prevalence, the subjective perception of this deterioration and its presence at all levels of asthma severity lead us to urge research into possible premenstrual deterioration in all fertile asthmatic females
Collections
  • DMed - Artículos

My Account

LoginRegister

Browse

All of DIGIBUGCommunities and CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectFinanciaciónAuthor profilesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectFinanciación

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Servicios

Pasos para autoarchivoAyudaLicencias Creative CommonsSHERPA/RoMEODulcinea Biblioteca UniversitariaNos puedes encontrar a través deCondiciones legales

Contact Us | Send Feedback