Development and validation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor measurement in human urine samples as a non-invasive effect biomarker
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor
Olivas Martínez, Alicia; Suárez, Beatriz; Salamanca Fernández, Elena; Reina Pérez, Iris; Rodríguez Carrillo, Andrea; Mustieles Miralles, Vicente; Olea Serrano, Nicolás; Freire, Carmen; Fernández Cabrera, Mariana FátimaEditorial
Frontiers
Materia
BDNF Validation Urine Effect biomarker Human health
Date
2023-01-12Referencia bibliográfica
Olivas-Martinez A... [et al.] (2023) Development and validation of brainderived neurotrophic factor measurement in human urine samples as a non-invasive effect biomarker. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 15:1075613. doi: [10.3389/fnmol.2022.1075613]
Sponsorship
European Commission 733032; Biomedical Research Networking Center-CIBER de Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERESP) of the Institute of Health Carlos III; Institute of Health Carlos III (SCIII) - European Regional Development Fund/FEDER FIS-PI17/01526 FIS-PI20/01656; Instituto de Salud Carlos III FI21/00236; Miguel Servet Type II Program CP1121/00014; Spanish Government FPU17/01848; Junta de Andalucia-PAIDI (Spain)Abstract
Background: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a neurotrophic
growth factor mainly expressed in the brain, has been proposed as a potential
effect biomarker; that is, as a measurable biomarker whose values could
be associated with several diseases, including neurological impairments. The
European Human Biomonitoring Initiative (HBM4EU) has also recognized
effect biomarkers as a useful tool for establishing link between exposure
to environmental pollutants and human health. Despite the well-establish
protocol for measuring serum BDNF, there is a need to validate its assessment
in urine, a non-invasive sample that can be easily repeated over time. The
aim of this study was to develop, standardize and validate a methodology to
quantify BDNF protein levels in urine samples before its implementation in
biomonitoring studies.
Methods: Different experimental conditions and non-competitive commercial
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits were tested to determine
the optimal analytical procedure, trying to minimize the shortcomings of
ELISA kits. The fine-tune protocol was validated in a pilot study using both
upon awakening (n = 150) and prior to sleeping (n = 106) urine samples from the
same Spanish adolescent males in a well-characterized study population (the
Spanish INMA-Granada cohort).
Results: The best results were obtained in 0.6 ml of urine after the acidification
and extraction (pre-concentration) of samples. The highest reproducibility was
obtained with the ELISA kit from Raybiotech. Urinary BDNF concentrations of
adolescent males were within the previously reported range (morning = 0.047–
6.801 ng/ml and night = 0.047–7.404 ng/ml). Urinary BDNF levels in the
awakening and pre-sleep samples did not follow a normal distribution and
were not correlated. Conclusion: The developed methodology offers good sensitivity and reproducibility. Having reliable markers in urine may facilitate both diagnosis and monitoring possible diseases (and treatment). Further studies are needed to implement urinary BDNF in biomonitoring studies to further elucidate its usefulness and biological significance for neurological impairments.