Fibromyalgia as a Heterogeneous Condition: Subgroups of Patients Based on Physical Symptoms and Cognitive-Affective Variables Related to Pain
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor
Martínez Narváez-Cabeza de Vaca, María del Pilar; Sánchez Gómez, Ana Isabel; Prados García, Germán; Lami, María J.; Villar, Beatriz; Miró Morales, María ElenaEditorial
Cambridge University Press
Materia
Cluster analysis Cognitive-affective variables Fibromyalgia Physical symptoms Subgroups
Date
2021-05-18Referencia bibliográfica
Martínez, M. P... [et al.] (2021). Fibromyalgia as a heterogeneous condition: Subgroups of patients based on physical symptoms and cognitive-affective variables related to pain. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 24. e33. Doi:[10.1017/SJP.2021.30]
Sponsorship
Spanish Government PSI2014-58379-P PID2019-109612GB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033Abstract
Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic syndrome characterized by heterogeneous clinical manifestations, and knowing
this variability can help to develop tailored treatments. To understand better the heterogeneity of FM the present crosssectional
study analyzed the role of several physical symptoms (pain, fatigue and poor sleep quality) and cognitive-affective
variables related to pain (pain catastrophizing, pain vigilance, self-efficacy in pain management, and pain acceptance) in the
configuration of clinical profiles. A sample of 161 women with FMfulfilled an interview and several self-report measures to
explore physical symptoms, cognitive-affective variables, disability and psychopathology. To establish FM groups a
hierarchical cluster analysis was performed. The findings revealed three clusters that differed in the grouping variables,
Wilks’ λ = .17, F(14, 304) = 31.50, p < .001, ηp2 = .59.Group 1 (n = 72) was characterized by high physical and psychological
affectation, Group 2 (n = 19) by lowphysical affectation and high pain self-efficacy, and Group 3 (n = 70) bymoderate physical
affectation and low pain catastrophizing. The external validation of the clusters was confirmed, Wilks’ λ = .72, F(4, 314) =
14.09, p < .001, ηp2 = .15, showing Group 1 the highest levels of FMimpact and psychopathological distress. Considering the
distinctive clinical characteristics of each subgroup therapeutic strategies addressed to the specific needs of each group were
suggested. Assessing FM profiles may be key for a better understanding and approach of this syndrome.